Re: [asa] Definition of evolution

From: John Burgeson (ASA member) <hossradbourne@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Oct 30 2009 - 14:24:17 EDT

I'm comfortable with "supposed," myself, it is accurate, but it does
sound sort of wimpy.

On 10/30/09, Dave Wallace <wmdavid.wallace@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jim Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> Stateside, this particular usage of "supposed" has a dismissive or
>> belittling nuance. It says essentially that an assertion you may make with
>> confidence is only a less unsubstantial supposition in my view.  JimA
>> [Friend of ASA]
>>
> Or as anti evolutionists would put it, 'Only a Theory'.  To which I reply
> that Ohm's law and Maxwell's equations etc are only a theories upon which a
> lot of the modern world of electronics is built.
>
> Dave W
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with "unsubscribe
> asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.

-- 
Burgy
www.burgy.50megs.com
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Oct 30 14:24:43 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 30 2009 - 14:24:43 EDT