"I would HOPE that it is obvious that DR is making such a criticism DESPITE
the evidence that an EBBS can be competent - even of above average
competence - and can practice science without distortion due to EBB.
As such, it should be obvious that it's DR who lacks scientific competence
in that he is not allowing evidence to dictate his claims, but is operating
according to an a priori agenda - that is, his conclusion is fixed prior to
making any consideration of the data."
Exactly! There is a core hypocrisy in the message of many New Atheist
leaders. While they like to drop the word "science" as often as they can,
then just as often abandon scientific thinking and replace it with rhetoric
and propaganda. It reminds me of an old All in the Family episode, where
Archie engages in all kinds of deception in order to baptize his grandson.
At one point, he tells Edith, "I'm going to get that kid baptized if I have
to break EVERY commandment to do it!" The New Atheists likewise seem to
have this position that says, "I'm going to get people to embrace science if
I have to use every tactic of propaganda to do it!"
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Murray Hogg" <muzhogg@netspace.net.au>
To: "ASA" <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: [asa] Re: (Santa?) [christians_in_science] Brilliant article by
Dawkins
> Hi Bernie,
>
> I suppose *from Dawkins' perspective* it makes sense.
>
> But the analogy of the Easter Bunny Believing Scientist (EBBS) should be
> thought through to its conclusion.
>
> Let's say there were such an EBBS and that not only did the EBBS show NO
> evidence of distorting scientific claims in the interests of promoting
> Easter Bunny Belief (EBB), BUT the EBBS was, in fact, an above average
> scientist and science administrator.
>
> Then along comes a person - let's call him Dichard Rawkins (DR) - who
> claims that holding to EBB is catastrophic to the scientific endeavour,
> and that because of their EBB no EBBS should be considered a credible
> scientist, and that therefore no EBBS should be allowed to hold a position
> of social or scientific trust.
>
> I would HOPE that it is obvious that DR is making such a criticism DESPITE
> the evidence that an EBBS can be competent - even of above average
> competence - and can practice science without distortion due to EBB.
>
> As such, it should be obvious that it's DR who lacks scientific competence
> in that he is not allowing evidence to dictate his claims, but is
> operating according to an a priori agenda - that is, his conclusion is
> fixed prior to making any consideration of the data.
>
> I would readily admit that to ban EBBS from positions of trust would be
> quite consistent with DR's anti-EBB agenda. But, what I would question, is
> why he thinks arguing that EBB brings EBBS's competence into question is a
> valid argument when the evidence so clearly demonstrates that this is not
> the case.
>
> So, yeah, I suppose an attack on Francis Collins makes sense from Richard
> Dawkins' position - but that tells me a great deal more about Dawkins than
> it does about Collins.
>
> Blessings,
> Murray
>
> Dehler, Bernie wrote:
>> To see it from Dawkins perspective, would any ASA scientist/theologian
>> object to a famous scientist who is appointed to NIH who believes in the
>> Easter Bunny, and sets up a website promoting the Easter Bunny? Because
>> from Dawkin’s perspective, the Easter Bunny is the exact same as
>> Yahweh. To Dawkins, both are superstitious myth… on the same exact
>> level of nonsense.
>>
>>
>>
>> So while you don’t obviously agree with Dawkin’s about Yahweh, it is
>> easy to see why he says what he does, right?
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.408 / Virus Database: 270.13.65/2322 - Release Date: 08/23/09
18:03:00
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Aug 25 22:03:14 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 25 2009 - 22:03:14 EDT