ASA - May 2009 By Date
641 messages
:
Starting
Fri May 01 2009 - 02:16:23 EDT,
Ending
Sun May 31 2009 - 21:05:25 EDT
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [
subject
] [
attachment
]
Nearby
: [
Other mail archives
]
Sun May 31 2009 - 21:04:47 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Schwarzwald
Sun May 31 2009 - 20:11:23 EDT
Re: [asa] science education
Ted Davis
Sun May 31 2009 - 19:57:03 EDT
Re: [asa] Concept of "nature" and "natural" in the ancient world?
Ted Davis
Sun May 31 2009 - 19:52:33 EDT
[asa] Re: Gingerich on TE and ID
Ted Davis
Sun May 31 2009 - 19:36:46 EDT
Re: [asa] The argument against the argument against design
wjp
Sun May 31 2009 - 18:46:01 EDT
RE: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Dick Fischer
Sun May 31 2009 - 18:51:35 EDT
[asa] The Physical
Bill Powers
Sun May 31 2009 - 17:37:13 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Randy Isaac
Sun May 31 2009 - 17:28:33 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Don Nield
Sun May 31 2009 - 17:25:30 EDT
Re: [asa] science education
Bill Powers
Sun May 31 2009 - 16:50:32 EDT
Re: [asa] science education
Cameron Wybrow
Sun May 31 2009 - 13:49:17 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Schwarzwald
Sun May 31 2009 - 09:08:38 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Sun May 31 2009 - 08:54:08 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Sun May 31 2009 - 08:24:21 EDT
[asa] MN in Natural Sciences and Non-Natural Agents
Gregory Arago
Sun May 31 2009 - 07:30:30 EDT
Re: [asa] science education
Merv Bitikofer
Sun May 31 2009 - 06:58:37 EDT
Re: [asa] science education
Gregory Arago
Sun May 31 2009 - 03:57:25 EDT
Re: [asa] Concept of "nature" and "natural" in the ancient world?
Cameron Wybrow
Sun May 31 2009 - 02:36:56 EDT
Re: [asa] science education
Don Winterstein
Sun May 31 2009 - 02:16:39 EDT
[asa] Concept of "nature" and "natural" in the ancient world?
Christine Smith
Sun May 31 2009 - 00:23:20 EDT
[asa] Experimental science and metascience
Terry M. Gray
Sat May 30 2009 - 23:57:22 EDT
[asa] science education
Cameron Wybrow
Sat May 30 2009 - 23:34:15 EDT
[asa] Re: ID vis a vis id
Cameron Wybrow
Sat May 30 2009 - 22:53:10 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Terry M.Gray
Sat May 30 2009 - 22:52:49 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Terry M.Gray
Sat May 30 2009 - 19:14:18 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Schwarzwald
Sat May 30 2009 - 18:36:26 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Sat May 30 2009 - 17:06:44 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Michael Roberts
Sat May 30 2009 - 16:53:49 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Terry M. Gray
Sat May 30 2009 - 14:27:51 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Gregory Arago
Sat May 30 2009 - 13:00:08 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Sat May 30 2009 - 12:55:19 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Sat May 30 2009 - 12:24:29 EDT
RE: [asa] The whole of reality (subject name changed)
Alexanian, Moorad
Sat May 30 2009 - 07:22:51 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Jack
Fri May 29 2009 - 18:45:02 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Fri May 29 2009 - 17:15:58 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
steamdoc@aol.com
Fri May 29 2009 - 16:50:04 EDT
Re: [asa] RE:(feedback) Kenneth Miller in Portland Oregon tomorrow, Thur.
Michael Roberts
Fri May 29 2009 - 16:37:37 EDT
[asa] RE:(feedback) Kenneth Miller in Portland Oregon tomorrow, Thur.
Dehler, Bernie
Fri May 29 2009 - 16:02:19 EDT
Re: [asa] The argument against the argument against design
Bill Powers
Fri May 29 2009 - 15:51:24 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Gregory Arago
Fri May 29 2009 - 15:47:20 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri May 29 2009 - 15:46:56 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Terry M. Gray
Fri May 29 2009 - 15:38:20 EDT
RE: [asa] Re: chance (formerrly BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri May 29 2009 - 15:29:39 EDT
RE: [asa] The whole of reality
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri May 29 2009 - 15:30:36 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Gregory Arago
Fri May 29 2009 - 15:15:03 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
steamdoc@aol.com
Fri May 29 2009 - 14:07:55 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Ted Davis
Fri May 29 2009 - 13:51:54 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Cameron Wybrow
Fri May 29 2009 - 13:27:31 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Terry M. Gray
Fri May 29 2009 - 10:59:05 EDT
[asa] God of the Gaps
Austerberry, Charles
Fri May 29 2009 - 10:33:26 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: chance (formerrly BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Schwarzwald
Fri May 29 2009 - 09:31:16 EDT
Re: [asa] The argument against the argument against design
Chris Barden
Fri May 29 2009 - 09:16:12 EDT
RE: [asa] The whole of reality (subject name changed)
Bill Powers
Fri May 29 2009 - 08:55:57 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Nucacids
Fri May 29 2009 - 08:39:34 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Fri May 29 2009 - 08:24:43 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Fri May 29 2009 - 08:22:37 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Fri May 29 2009 - 07:50:44 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Nucacids
Fri May 29 2009 - 07:36:54 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Fri May 29 2009 - 06:28:51 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Cameron Wybrow
Fri May 29 2009 - 05:19:52 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Fri May 29 2009 - 02:26:28 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: chance (formerrly BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Terry M. Gray
Fri May 29 2009 - 02:22:26 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Terry M.Gray
Fri May 29 2009 - 02:20:02 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Don Winterstein
Fri May 29 2009 - 01:45:06 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Terry M.Gray
Fri May 29 2009 - 01:09:20 EDT
Re: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
Don Winterstein
Thu May 28 2009 - 22:15:49 EDT
[asa] Re: chance (formerrly BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Schwarzwald
Thu May 28 2009 - 21:43:13 EDT
RE: [asa] The whole of reality (subject name changed)
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu May 28 2009 - 21:36:45 EDT
RE: [asa] The whole of reality (subject name changed)
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu May 28 2009 - 20:31:32 EDT
Re: [asa] chance (formerrly BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Randy Isaac
Thu May 28 2009 - 20:10:25 EDT
[asa] Re: chance (formerrly BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Schwarzwald
Thu May 28 2009 - 19:34:20 EDT
RE: [asa] The whole of reality (subject name changed)
Bill Powers
Thu May 28 2009 - 19:34:00 EDT
[asa] chance (formerrly BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Don Nield
Thu May 28 2009 - 19:24:21 EDT
Re: [asa] The whole of reality (subject name changed)
Bill Powers
Thu May 28 2009 - 19:00:22 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Schwarzwald
Thu May 28 2009 - 18:59:12 EDT
[asa] hiatus
Jon Tandy
Thu May 28 2009 - 18:23:40 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Thu May 28 2009 - 18:04:55 EDT
RE: [asa] The whole of reality
Gregory Arago
Thu May 28 2009 - 17:37:00 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Gregory Arago
Thu May 28 2009 - 17:04:05 EDT
RE: [asa] The whole of reality (subject name changed)
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu May 28 2009 - 16:43:17 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Gregory Arago
Thu May 28 2009 - 16:29:05 EDT
Re: [asa] The whole of reality (subject name changed)
dfsiemensjr
Thu May 28 2009 - 16:19:05 EDT
Re: [asa] The whole of reality (subject name changed)
Bill Powers
Thu May 28 2009 - 15:41:45 EDT
[asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Thu May 28 2009 - 12:11:50 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Terry M. Gray
Thu May 28 2009 - 11:11:55 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Terry M. Gray
Thu May 28 2009 - 11:00:01 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Thu May 28 2009 - 10:26:12 EDT
Re: [asa] ID vis a vis id
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Thu May 28 2009 - 09:56:34 EDT
[asa] The whole of reality (subject name changed)
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu May 28 2009 - 09:45:51 EDT
[asa] ID vis a vis id
Ted Davis
Thu May 28 2009 - 09:07:09 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Cameron Wybrow
Thu May 28 2009 - 09:07:17 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Bill Powers
Thu May 28 2009 - 07:32:32 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Randy Isaac
Thu May 28 2009 - 03:22:07 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
gregoryarago@yahoo.ca
Thu May 28 2009 - 03:08:30 EDT
Re: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
Michael Roberts
Thu May 28 2009 - 02:38:25 EDT
Re: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
Don Winterstein
Thu May 28 2009 - 01:44:51 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Wed May 27 2009 - 23:18:23 EDT
Re: [asa] The Theocracy is Coming! [again]
dfsiemensjr
Wed May 27 2009 - 22:48:25 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Cameron Wybrow
Wed May 27 2009 - 20:59:35 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Bill Powers
Wed May 27 2009 - 20:58:24 EDT
[asa] Kenneth Miller in Portland Oregon tomorrow, Thur.
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 27 2009 - 20:33:15 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Wed May 27 2009 - 20:10:19 EDT
RE: [asa] The Theocracy is Coming! [again]
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Wed May 27 2009 - 18:44:24 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Merv Bitikofer
Wed May 27 2009 - 17:04:05 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Wed May 27 2009 - 13:46:06 EDT
Re: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
Dave Wallace
Wed May 27 2009 - 13:50:04 EDT
RE: [asa] The Theocracy is Coming! [again]
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 27 2009 - 12:34:14 EDT
Re: [asa] The Theocracy is Coming! [again]
Ted Davis
Wed May 27 2009 - 12:22:44 EDT
Re: [asa] The Theocracy is Coming! [again]
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Wed May 27 2009 - 12:11:44 EDT
Re: [asa] The Theocracy is Coming! [again]
Iain Strachan
Wed May 27 2009 - 12:09:34 EDT
RE: [asa] The Theocracy is Coming! [again]
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 27 2009 - 11:54:37 EDT
[asa] The Theocracy is Coming! [again]
Nucacids
Wed May 27 2009 - 11:09:48 EDT
[asa] podcast about new book, "Galileo Goes to Jail"
Ted Davis
Wed May 27 2009 - 10:53:08 EDT
Re: [asa] Course on history of ID at Rutgers
Ted Davis
Wed May 27 2009 - 10:50:54 EDT
Re: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
Don Winterstein
Wed May 27 2009 - 10:50:22 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Wed May 27 2009 - 10:44:17 EDT
Re: [asa] Course on history of ID at Rutgers
Gregory Arago
Wed May 27 2009 - 10:37:25 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Don Winterstein
Wed May 27 2009 - 10:37:13 EDT
Re: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Wed May 27 2009 - 10:26:12 EDT
Re: [asa] Course on history of ID at Rutgers
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Wed May 27 2009 - 10:25:44 EDT
Re: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
Michael Roberts
Wed May 27 2009 - 10:20:28 EDT
Re: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Wed May 27 2009 - 10:09:54 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Ted Davis
Wed May 27 2009 - 10:06:04 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Don Winterstein
Wed May 27 2009 - 09:14:25 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Schwarzwald
Wed May 27 2009 - 09:11:04 EDT
[asa] The argument against the argument against design
wjp
Wed May 27 2009 - 07:59:18 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Merv Bitikofer
Wed May 27 2009 - 07:05:16 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Wed May 27 2009 - 06:51:22 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Wed May 27 2009 - 06:24:24 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Randy Isaac
Wed May 27 2009 - 01:31:06 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Terry M. Gray
Wed May 27 2009 - 00:51:53 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
wjp
Wed May 27 2009 - 00:20:03 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Terry M. Gray
Wed May 27 2009 - 00:18:39 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
wjp
Wed May 27 2009 - 00:09:24 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Cameron Wybrow
Tue May 26 2009 - 23:49:56 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Terry M. Gray
Tue May 26 2009 - 23:32:20 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue May 26 2009 - 23:03:52 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Nucacids
Tue May 26 2009 - 22:41:31 EDT
[asa] ID and Methodological Naturalism
Cameron Wybrow
Tue May 26 2009 - 22:30:42 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Tue May 26 2009 - 22:30:15 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Tue May 26 2009 - 22:28:46 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Randy Isaac
Tue May 26 2009 - 22:29:00 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Tue May 26 2009 - 17:29:57 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Tue May 26 2009 - 15:28:50 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Ted Davis
Tue May 26 2009 - 15:23:18 EDT
[asa] Course on history of ID at Rutgers
Ted Davis
Tue May 26 2009 - 15:04:22 EDT
Re: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
David Campbell
Tue May 26 2009 - 14:38:49 EDT
Re: [asa] The Defeat of Keith Miller's View of MN = Science
David Campbell
Tue May 26 2009 - 14:04:01 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Michael Roberts
Tue May 26 2009 - 13:39:47 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Gregory Arago
Tue May 26 2009 - 12:49:37 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Gregory Arago
Tue May 26 2009 - 11:14:02 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue May 26 2009 - 09:23:45 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Mon May 25 2009 - 23:45:57 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Bill Powers
Mon May 25 2009 - 22:31:32 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon May 25 2009 - 19:33:21 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Bill Powers
Mon May 25 2009 - 18:49:13 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
dfsiemensjr
Mon May 25 2009 - 17:08:33 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Jim Armstrong
Mon May 25 2009 - 16:24:25 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon May 25 2009 - 16:19:35 EDT
RE: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon May 25 2009 - 15:20:34 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Bill Powers
Mon May 25 2009 - 15:11:27 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Bill Powers
Mon May 25 2009 - 14:43:47 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
dfsiemensjr
Mon May 25 2009 - 14:38:37 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
mrb22667@kansas.net
Mon May 25 2009 - 13:38:54 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Jim Armstrong
Mon May 25 2009 - 13:07:33 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon May 25 2009 - 12:43:42 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Jim Armstrong
Mon May 25 2009 - 12:36:48 EDT
RE: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon May 25 2009 - 12:20:37 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Jim Armstrong
Mon May 25 2009 - 12:07:51 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon May 25 2009 - 11:20:31 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Dave Wallace
Mon May 25 2009 - 10:56:37 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon May 25 2009 - 10:37:50 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon May 25 2009 - 10:20:35 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Jim Armstrong
Mon May 25 2009 - 07:24:21 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Merv Bitikofer
Mon May 25 2009 - 03:07:47 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Cameron Wybrow
Mon May 25 2009 - 02:45:06 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Gregory Arago
Sun May 24 2009 - 21:20:38 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Sun May 24 2009 - 20:46:49 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
wjp
Sun May 24 2009 - 19:28:57 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
dfsiemensjr
Sun May 24 2009 - 16:04:13 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
wjp
Sun May 24 2009 - 12:43:03 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Alexanian, Moorad
Sun May 24 2009 - 10:47:29 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
wjp
Sun May 24 2009 - 09:15:08 EDT
RE: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Alexanian, Moorad
Sun May 24 2009 - 09:00:24 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Gregory Arago
Sun May 24 2009 - 08:09:00 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Merv Bitikofer
Sun May 24 2009 - 04:33:34 EDT
Re: [asa] The Defeat of Keith Miller's View of MN = Science
Gregory Arago
Sun May 24 2009 - 00:18:06 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Cameron Wybrow
Sat May 23 2009 - 22:17:41 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Merv Bitikofer
Sat May 23 2009 - 20:33:15 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Sat May 23 2009 - 19:11:50 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Randy Isaac
Sat May 23 2009 - 18:52:46 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Cameron Wybrow
Sat May 23 2009 - 17:40:17 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Keith Miller
Sat May 23 2009 - 16:15:35 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Terry M. Gray
Sat May 23 2009 - 15:50:34 EDT
[asa] The Defeat of Keith Miller's View of MN = Science - 2
Gregory Arago
Sat May 23 2009 - 15:47:34 EDT
[asa] The Defeat of Keith Miller's View of MN = Science
Gregory Arago
Sat May 23 2009 - 05:52:53 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Dave Wallace
Sat May 23 2009 - 15:40:48 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Randy Isaac
Sat May 23 2009 - 15:37:54 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Sat May 23 2009 - 15:26:03 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Gregory Arago
Sat May 23 2009 - 15:26:07 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Terry M. Gray
Sat May 23 2009 - 15:17:18 EDT
Re: [asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Randy Isaac
Sat May 23 2009 - 14:47:18 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Keith Miller
Sat May 23 2009 - 10:50:43 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Fri May 22 2009 - 22:57:25 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Fri May 22 2009 - 21:07:48 EDT
[asa] Musing on entropy, chaos, and omniscience
Merv Bitikofer
Fri May 22 2009 - 19:36:04 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
Gregory Arago
Fri May 22 2009 - 18:40:32 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Cameron Wybrow
Fri May 22 2009 - 15:56:25 EDT
[asa] 2100 AD temperatures
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Fri May 22 2009 - 13:50:01 EDT
Re: [asa] PaleoPeople
Paul Bruggink
Fri May 22 2009 - 12:36:26 EDT
RE: [asa] Behe on Darwin, design and teleology
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri May 22 2009 - 11:15:03 EDT
Re: [asa] Behe on Darwin, design and teleology
Ted Davis
Fri May 22 2009 - 10:50:24 EDT
Re: [asa] Natural Agents - Cause and Effect, Non-Natural Agents
Keith Miller
Fri May 22 2009 - 10:42:42 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
wjp
Fri May 22 2009 - 10:27:50 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Fri May 22 2009 - 09:51:28 EDT
[asa] Another Approach
Nucacids
Fri May 22 2009 - 08:42:11 EDT
Re: [asa] Behe on Darwin, design and teleology
Schwarzwald
Fri May 22 2009 - 08:38:22 EDT
Re: [asa] Behe on Darwin, design and teleology
Dave Wallace
Fri May 22 2009 - 08:24:02 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Fri May 22 2009 - 06:36:24 EDT
Re: [asa] Darwinism
Dave Wallace
Fri May 22 2009 - 06:26:49 EDT
Re: [asa] Behe on Darwin, design and teleology
Randy Isaac
Thu May 21 2009 - 23:32:49 EDT
[asa] Behe on Darwin, design and teleology
Cameron Wybrow
Thu May 21 2009 - 21:25:23 EDT
[asa] PaleoPeople
Keith Miller
Thu May 21 2009 - 20:16:29 EDT
RE: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Dehler, Bernie
Thu May 21 2009 - 18:54:25 EDT
Re: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Dave Wallace
Thu May 21 2009 - 18:21:57 EDT
Re: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Cameron Wybrow
Thu May 21 2009 - 17:10:31 EDT
[asa] This Month in Physics History: May 31, 1957: DeWitt’s Letter on Everett’s “Many Worlds” Theory
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu May 21 2009 - 10:28:40 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Thu May 21 2009 - 14:16:35 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Thu May 21 2009 - 14:15:53 EDT
RE: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Dehler, Bernie
Thu May 21 2009 - 14:04:26 EDT
[asa] problem with latest post
Ted Davis
Thu May 21 2009 - 13:57:59 EDT
Re: [asa] What is Darwinism? What is TE?
Ted Davis
Thu May 21 2009 - 13:40:42 EDT
[asa] Francis Collin's recent song
Dehler, Bernie
Thu May 21 2009 - 12:36:25 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
Ted Davis
Thu May 21 2009 - 12:24:00 EDT
[asa] behe's publications
Ted Davis
Thu May 21 2009 - 12:18:20 EDT
Re: [asa] The theology Darwin didnt change
David Campbell
Thu May 21 2009 - 11:53:19 EDT
RE: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Dehler, Bernie
Thu May 21 2009 - 11:24:49 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
Gregory Arago
Thu May 21 2009 - 10:02:33 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Thu May 21 2009 - 07:18:44 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
Schwarzwald
Thu May 21 2009 - 06:00:24 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
Gregory Arago
Thu May 21 2009 - 03:05:42 EDT
Re: [asa] What is Darwinism? What is TE?
Cameron Wybrow
Thu May 21 2009 - 00:57:51 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
wjp
Wed May 20 2009 - 21:39:36 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Wed May 20 2009 - 20:28:31 EDT
Re: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Cameron Wybrow
Wed May 20 2009 - 18:55:13 EDT
RE: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 20 2009 - 18:06:35 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
wjp
Wed May 20 2009 - 16:17:13 EDT
Re: [asa] Teaching Religion In Science Class
gordon brown
Wed May 20 2009 - 16:06:21 EDT
Re: [asa] Teaching Religion In Science Class
Ted Davis
Wed May 20 2009 - 16:05:56 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Cameron Wybrow
Wed May 20 2009 - 16:02:46 EDT
[asa] Well! Hello great...?...grandma!
Vernon Jenkins
Wed May 20 2009 - 15:53:38 EDT
[asa] Teaching Religion In Science Class
David Clounch
Wed May 20 2009 - 15:45:11 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Wed May 20 2009 - 15:02:13 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Wed May 20 2009 - 14:50:10 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
Ted Davis
Wed May 20 2009 - 14:36:28 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (Behe vs. Behe)
Randy Isaac
Wed May 20 2009 - 14:22:40 EDT
[asa] How hot will it get by 2100 AD?
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Wed May 20 2009 - 14:22:47 EDT
RE: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Ted Davis
Wed May 20 2009 - 12:22:08 EDT
Re: [asa] What is Darwinism? What is TE?
Ted Davis
Wed May 20 2009 - 11:06:10 EDT
RE: [asa] What is Darwinism? What is TE? (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 20 2009 - 10:57:13 EDT
Re: [asa] physics in religion
Bill Powers
Wed May 20 2009 - 10:22:12 EDT
[asa] physics in religion
Alexanian, Moorad
Wed May 20 2009 - 05:17:25 EDT
Re: [asa] What is Darwinism? What is TE?
Gregory Arago
Wed May 20 2009 - 04:45:42 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Gregory Arago
Wed May 20 2009 - 03:30:30 EDT
[asa] What is Darwinism? What is TE? (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Cameron Wybrow
Wed May 20 2009 - 03:21:45 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Wed May 20 2009 - 00:51:18 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
David Clounch
Wed May 20 2009 - 00:31:24 EDT
Re: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
David Clounch
Wed May 20 2009 - 00:25:40 EDT
Re: [asa] TE The Future
Murray Hogg
Wed May 20 2009 - 00:11:41 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Tue May 19 2009 - 23:52:54 EDT
[asa] TE The Future
David Clounch
Tue May 19 2009 - 23:16:11 EDT
RE: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue May 19 2009 - 22:14:59 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Schwarzwald
Tue May 19 2009 - 20:13:20 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Merv Bitikofer
Tue May 19 2009 - 19:55:41 EDT
RE: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Dehler, Bernie
Tue May 19 2009 - 19:23:58 EDT
[asa] on modern and pre-modern
Ted Davis
Tue May 19 2009 - 19:22:43 EDT
RE: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Ted Davis
Tue May 19 2009 - 19:10:39 EDT
RE: [asa] Darwinism (was: BioLogos - Bad Theology?)
Dehler, Bernie
Tue May 19 2009 - 18:27:02 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Tue May 19 2009 - 16:03:50 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Tue May 19 2009 - 14:56:10 EDT
RE: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue May 19 2009 - 14:09:31 EDT
Re: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
Bill Powers
Tue May 19 2009 - 13:36:05 EDT
[asa] The theology Darwin didnt change
Michael Roberts
Tue May 19 2009 - 13:11:21 EDT
RE: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Dehler, Bernie
Tue May 19 2009 - 12:52:01 EDT
Re: [asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
Michael Roberts
Tue May 19 2009 - 11:41:22 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
mrb22667@kansas.net
Tue May 19 2009 - 10:32:49 EDT
[asa] Fossil Discovery Is Heralded
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue May 19 2009 - 09:52:55 EDT
[asa] 47-MILLION-YEAR-OLD MONKEY: THE LINK IN HUMAN EVOLUTION?
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue May 19 2009 - 08:32:43 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Tue May 19 2009 - 08:29:10 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Tue May 19 2009 - 02:37:06 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Iain Strachan
Tue May 19 2009 - 00:50:06 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Tue May 19 2009 - 00:18:45 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Schwarzwald
Tue May 19 2009 - 00:11:49 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Schwarzwald
Mon May 18 2009 - 21:47:08 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Ted Davis
Mon May 18 2009 - 20:19:53 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Mon May 18 2009 - 20:14:58 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Mon May 18 2009 - 18:40:32 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Mon May 18 2009 - 18:38:21 EDT
RE: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology? (Isn't God a male?)
Dehler, Bernie
Mon May 18 2009 - 17:26:19 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Mon May 18 2009 - 16:52:52 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Iain Strachan
Mon May 18 2009 - 16:44:14 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Bethany Sollereder
Mon May 18 2009 - 16:00:10 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Mon May 18 2009 - 14:03:36 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Iain Strachan
Mon May 18 2009 - 13:33:37 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Gregory Arago
Mon May 18 2009 - 13:24:50 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Douglas Hayworth
Mon May 18 2009 - 13:23:02 EDT
[asa] Non sequitur
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon May 18 2009 - 12:54:36 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Mon May 18 2009 - 12:43:11 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Mon May 18 2009 - 11:14:40 EDT
RE: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
Dehler, Bernie
Mon May 18 2009 - 10:51:32 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
George Murphy
Mon May 18 2009 - 10:47:01 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
George Murphy
Mon May 18 2009 - 09:49:49 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Schwarzwald
Mon May 18 2009 - 09:12:11 EDT
Re: [asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Ted Davis
Mon May 18 2009 - 09:09:38 EDT
[asa] PZ Myers challenges ID advocates
Ted Davis
Mon May 18 2009 - 09:05:47 EDT
[asa] BioLogos - Bad Theology?
Nucacids
Mon May 18 2009 - 08:50:16 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Nucacids
Mon May 18 2009 - 06:30:58 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
Schwarzwald
Sun May 17 2009 - 20:14:47 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Gregory Arago
Sun May 17 2009 - 19:56:26 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
George Murphy
Sun May 17 2009 - 19:19:52 EDT
RE: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
Alexanian, Moorad
Sun May 17 2009 - 17:51:24 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
Schwarzwald
Sun May 17 2009 - 17:18:48 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
George Murphy
Sun May 17 2009 - 15:54:33 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
George Murphy
Sun May 17 2009 - 15:23:59 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
George Murphy
Sun May 17 2009 - 08:26:58 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
Cameron Wybrow
Sun May 17 2009 - 01:34:25 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
Dave Wallace
Sat May 16 2009 - 23:22:59 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
Cameron Wybrow
Sat May 16 2009 - 17:45:55 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
George Murphy
Sat May 16 2009 - 16:37:36 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology?
Dave Wallace
Fri May 15 2009 - 21:59:24 EDT
Re: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
Murray Hogg
Fri May 15 2009 - 21:46:34 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
Cameron Wybrow
Fri May 15 2009 - 21:23:40 EDT
Re: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
George Murphy
Fri May 15 2009 - 21:22:26 EDT
Re: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
Murray Hogg
Fri May 15 2009 - 20:17:05 EDT
RE: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
mrb22667@kansas.net
Fri May 15 2009 - 17:59:35 EDT
RE: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
Dehler, Bernie
Fri May 15 2009 - 16:51:54 EDT
Re: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
George Murphy
Fri May 15 2009 - 16:10:49 EDT
RE: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
Dehler, Bernie
Fri May 15 2009 - 15:40:08 EDT
Re: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Fri May 15 2009 - 15:37:39 EDT
Re: [asa] Article on EPA proposed rules in WorldNet Daily
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Fri May 15 2009 - 15:30:48 EDT
Re: [asa] Fw: Public Lecture: Discovery of Global Warming
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Fri May 15 2009 - 15:23:24 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
George Murphy
Thu May 14 2009 - 17:24:28 EDT
Re: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
Dave Wallace
Thu May 14 2009 - 18:06:53 EDT
[asa] Fw: Public Lecture: Discovery of Global Warming
Michael Roberts
Thu May 14 2009 - 17:07:38 EDT
[asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Szilágyi
George Murphy
Thu May 14 2009 - 17:06:06 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Cameron Wybrow
Thu May 14 2009 - 16:51:20 EDT
[asa] What Makes Us Happy?
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu May 14 2009 - 16:20:48 EDT
RE: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy (social evolution)
Dehler, Bernie
Thu May 14 2009 - 15:59:52 EDT
[asa] Gone for a while
William Hamilton
Thu May 14 2009 - 15:57:28 EDT
Re: [asa] Article on EPA proposed rules in WorldNet Daily
William Hamilton
Thu May 14 2009 - 14:20:07 EDT
Re: [asa] Article on EPA proposed rules in WorldNet Daily
steamdoc@aol.com
Thu May 14 2009 - 13:48:01 EDT
[asa] Article on EPA proposed rules in WorldNet Daily
William Hamilton
Thu May 14 2009 - 09:46:26 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Nucacids
Thu May 14 2009 - 03:29:12 EDT
[asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Szilágyi
Gregory Arago
Thu May 14 2009 - 03:27:31 EDT
Re: [asa] another coyne attack
Iain Strachan
Thu May 14 2009 - 02:11:55 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
Cameron Wybrow
Wed May 13 2009 - 23:31:27 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: "horror miraculi"(meaning)
Merv Bitikofer
Wed May 13 2009 - 21:51:34 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: "horror miraculi"(meaning)
Bill Powers
Wed May 13 2009 - 21:34:02 EDT
[asa] another coyne attack
George Murphy
Wed May 13 2009 - 20:03:45 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
dawson wayne
Wed May 13 2009 - 17:58:34 EDT
RE: [asa] Re: "horror miraculi"(meaning)
Alexanian, Moorad
Wed May 13 2009 - 17:53:16 EDT
RE: [asa] Re: "horror miraculi"(meaning)
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 13 2009 - 17:35:45 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: "horror miraculi"(meaning)
George Murphy
Wed May 13 2009 - 17:06:10 EDT
[asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Szilágyi
George Murphy
Wed May 13 2009 - 16:35:30 EDT
RE: [asa] Re: "horror miraculi"(meaning)
d.nield@auckland.ac.nz
Wed May 13 2009 - 16:06:07 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Schwarzwald
Wed May 13 2009 - 15:53:34 EDT
RE: [asa] Re: "horror miraculi"(meaning)
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 13 2009 - 15:25:31 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: "horror miraculi"
Gregory Arago
Wed May 13 2009 - 15:09:04 EDT
[asa] Re: "horror miraculi"
Cameron Wybrow
Wed May 13 2009 - 15:07:04 EDT
RE: [asa] "horror miraculi" (science vs. miracles)
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 13 2009 - 14:50:23 EDT
[asa] "horror miraculi"
Ted Davis
Wed May 13 2009 - 14:38:39 EDT
RE: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 13 2009 - 14:36:43 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Ted Davis
Wed May 13 2009 - 14:27:09 EDT
Re: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
David Campbell
Wed May 13 2009 - 14:21:04 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Wed May 13 2009 - 14:14:00 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle -Darwin's original sin
Cameron Wybrow
Wed May 13 2009 - 14:11:55 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Dave Wallace
Wed May 13 2009 - 12:46:22 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Ted Davis
Wed May 13 2009 - 12:35:01 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Cameron Wybrow
Wed May 13 2009 - 11:37:26 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Gregory Arago
Wed May 13 2009 - 09:26:52 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Ted Davis
Wed May 13 2009 - 01:54:05 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Schwarzwald
Tue May 12 2009 - 22:45:10 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Cameron Wybrow
Tue May 12 2009 - 21:22:06 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Schwarzwald
Tue May 12 2009 - 21:05:53 EDT
Re: [asa] Global Cooling
Rich Blinne
Tue May 12 2009 - 20:59:57 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Schwarzwald
Tue May 12 2009 - 16:31:42 EDT
RE: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
Dehler, Bernie
Tue May 12 2009 - 14:28:55 EDT
RE: [asa] Global Cooling
George Cooper
Tue May 12 2009 - 14:17:16 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Cameron Wybrow
Tue May 12 2009 - 14:01:05 EDT
Re: [asa] Global Cooling
Brent Foster
Tue May 12 2009 - 13:53:45 EDT
[asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Szilágyi
Gregory Arago
Tue May 12 2009 - 13:08:32 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Gregory Arago
Tue May 12 2009 - 12:35:49 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Dave Wallace
Tue May 12 2009 - 12:10:09 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
George Murphy
Tue May 12 2009 - 12:06:29 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Jim Armstrong
Tue May 12 2009 - 12:04:24 EDT
RE: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
Jon Tandy
Tue May 12 2009 - 10:43:53 EDT
[asa] Global Cooling
Jon Tandy
Tue May 12 2009 - 10:36:57 EDT
[asa] on teaching about ID in public schools
Ted Davis
Tue May 12 2009 - 10:34:19 EDT
RE: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Jon Tandy
Tue May 12 2009 - 10:16:20 EDT
[asa] Interesting article by McGrath
Austerberry, Charles
Tue May 12 2009 - 09:23:56 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Schwarzwald
Mon May 11 2009 - 22:16:21 EDT
Re: is faith necessary to understand the Bible? was Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
George Murphy
Mon May 11 2009 - 22:15:45 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Cameron Wybrow
Mon May 11 2009 - 19:10:21 EDT
RE: is faith necessary to understand the Bible? was Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon May 11 2009 - 18:55:38 EDT
Re: [asa] Because of us - Steve Fuller's anthropic principle - Darwin's original sin
Murray Hogg
Mon May 11 2009 - 18:08:40 EDT
Re: [asa] The Black Hole War: My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics
David Campbell
Mon May 11 2009 - 17:57:33 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
Michael Roberts
Mon May 11 2009 - 17:56:15 EDT
RE: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
Dehler, Bernie
Mon May 11 2009 - 17:48:13 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
David Campbell
Mon May 11 2009 - 17:29:44 EDT
Re: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
David Campbell
Mon May 11 2009 - 16:57:58 EDT
Re: [asa] natural theology, bad and good
David Campbell
Mon May 11 2009 - 16:16:11 EDT
RE: [asa] social evolution for Jon Tandy
Dehler, Bernie
Mon May 11 2009 - 15:52:18 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
Cameron Wybrow
Mon May 11 2009 - 14:31:46 EDT
[asa] Szilágyi
Dave Wallace
Mon May 11 2009 - 14:15:45 EDT
Re: [asa] MN and Falsifiability
Gregory Arago
Mon May 11 2009 - 14:10:25 EDT
RE: [asa] MN and Falsifiability
Jon Tandy
Mon May 11 2009 - 11:47:26 EDT
Re: [asa] MN and Falsifiability
Dave Wallace
Mon May 11 2009 - 11:07:08 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
George Murphy
Mon May 11 2009 - 10:42:13 EDT
FW: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
Jon Tandy
Mon May 11 2009 - 10:41:59 EDT
RE: [asa] MN and Falsifiability (was: Multiverse and ID)
Jon Tandy
Mon May 11 2009 - 10:08:58 EDT
[asa] McKinsey report argues the net cost of GHG stabilization is near zeor
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Mon May 11 2009 - 09:56:50 EDT
[asa] Re: Your Upcoming Bugle Article
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Mon May 11 2009 - 06:37:17 EDT
[asa] A scientific proof of the supernatural
Vernon Jenkins
Mon May 11 2009 - 04:41:40 EDT
Re: [asa] MN and Falsifiability (was: Multiverse and ID)
Schwarzwald
Mon May 11 2009 - 04:27:23 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
Cameron Wybrow
Mon May 11 2009 - 02:41:02 EDT
is faith necessary to understand the Bible? was Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Cameron Wybrow
Mon May 11 2009 - 00:35:03 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Cameron Wybrow
Mon May 11 2009 - 00:29:16 EDT
Re: [asa] MN and Falsifiability
Merv Bitikofer
Sun May 10 2009 - 21:17:27 EDT
[asa] MN and Falsifiability (was: Multiverse and ID)
Jon Tandy
Sun May 10 2009 - 19:33:43 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
dawson wayne
Sun May 10 2009 - 15:00:00 EDT
Re: [asa] ID and EC/TE relationship
Ted Davis
Sun May 10 2009 - 14:40:54 EDT
[asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Szilágyi
George Murphy
Sun May 10 2009 - 12:47:01 EDT
[asa] Re: [asa] Szilágyi
Gregory Arago
Sun May 10 2009 - 10:21:47 EDT
[asa] Szilágyi
Dave Wallace
Sun May 10 2009 - 09:24:50 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Sat May 09 2009 - 23:52:36 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
George Cooper
Sat May 09 2009 - 23:40:22 EDT
[asa] Sun cycles and global warming
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Sat May 09 2009 - 23:17:41 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Nucacids
Sat May 09 2009 - 19:03:08 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Bill Powers
Sat May 09 2009 - 18:14:11 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Bill Powers
Sat May 09 2009 - 17:34:10 EDT
[asa] Your Upcoming Bugle Article
Rich Blinne
Sat May 09 2009 - 16:30:48 EDT
RE: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Alexanian, Moorad
Sat May 09 2009 - 16:15:41 EDT
[asa] Adequacy of neo_Darwin... synthesis
Dave Wallace
Sat May 09 2009 - 14:18:09 EDT
[asa] ID and EC/TE relationship
Dave Wallace
Sat May 09 2009 - 14:07:49 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Jim Armstrong
Sat May 09 2009 - 14:01:27 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
dawson wayne
Sat May 09 2009 - 13:48:42 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Iain Strachan
Sat May 09 2009 - 13:33:42 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Bill Powers
Sat May 09 2009 - 13:26:40 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Iain Strachan
Sat May 09 2009 - 13:19:23 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Bill Powers
Sat May 09 2009 - 13:04:48 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
dawson wayne
Sat May 09 2009 - 12:47:19 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
dawson wayne
Sat May 09 2009 - 12:03:13 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Dave Wallace
Sat May 09 2009 - 11:32:54 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Jim Armstrong
Sat May 09 2009 - 10:36:05 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Iain Strachan
Sat May 09 2009 - 10:21:20 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
Bill Powers
Sat May 09 2009 - 03:05:49 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
dawson wayne
Fri May 08 2009 - 21:30:18 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
George Murphy
Fri May 08 2009 - 16:42:32 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
George Murphy
Fri May 08 2009 - 16:33:01 EDT
[asa] The Black Hole War: My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri May 08 2009 - 16:28:15 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
wjp
Fri May 08 2009 - 16:06:02 EDT
RE: [asa] Multiverse and ID
George Cooper
Fri May 08 2009 - 15:04:48 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
dawson wayne
Fri May 08 2009 - 15:03:29 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
George Murphy
Fri May 08 2009 - 14:44:42 EDT
RE: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri May 08 2009 - 14:04:03 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: Multiverse and ID
Lawrence Johnston
Fri May 08 2009 - 13:20:35 EDT
RE: [asa] Re: Multiverse and ID
George Cooper
Fri May 08 2009 - 13:02:06 EDT
Re: [asa] Multiverse and ID
wjp
Fri May 08 2009 - 12:09:33 EDT
[asa] Re: Multiverse and ID
Nucacids
Fri May 08 2009 - 12:06:42 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
Dehler, Bernie
Fri May 08 2009 - 11:56:24 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
George Murphy
Fri May 08 2009 - 11:55:17 EDT
[asa] What has happened to the soul?
Bill Powers
Fri May 08 2009 - 11:37:35 EDT
RE: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Alexanian, Moorad
Fri May 08 2009 - 11:16:10 EDT
[asa] Multiverse and ID
Ted Davis
Fri May 08 2009 - 10:25:05 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
George Murphy
Fri May 08 2009 - 09:40:20 EDT
[asa] The Influence of Climate
Nucacids
Fri May 08 2009 - 09:15:05 EDT
[asa] Fwd: REVIEW: 'A Medical Professor's Contribution to Nazi Medical Ethics'
Ted Davis
Fri May 08 2009 - 09:13:24 EDT
Re: [asa] Biology Brain Teaser
Nucacids
Fri May 08 2009 - 09:13:49 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
Ted Davis
Fri May 08 2009 - 08:26:53 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
George Murphy
Fri May 08 2009 - 00:05:30 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Cameron Wybrow
Thu May 07 2009 - 23:04:15 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
George Murphy
Thu May 07 2009 - 22:32:22 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Cameron Wybrow
Thu May 07 2009 - 21:52:42 EDT
[asa] What Makes Us Human?
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu May 07 2009 - 21:45:41 EDT
Re: [asa] Is God a big meanie?
wjp
Thu May 07 2009 - 21:22:31 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Nucacids
Thu May 07 2009 - 21:16:42 EDT
[asa] Biology Brain Teaser
Nucacids
Thu May 07 2009 - 20:57:47 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
dawson wayne
Thu May 07 2009 - 20:01:15 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
dawson wayne
Thu May 07 2009 - 19:13:26 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
Cameron Wybrow
Thu May 07 2009 - 19:08:54 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
dawson wayne
Thu May 07 2009 - 18:14:06 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Cameron Wybrow
Thu May 07 2009 - 16:46:20 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
George Murphy
Thu May 07 2009 - 16:32:46 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
gordon brown
Thu May 07 2009 - 16:02:40 EDT
Re: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu May 07 2009 - 15:27:04 EDT
RE: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Dehler, Bernie
Thu May 07 2009 - 14:59:15 EDT
RE: [asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu May 07 2009 - 14:27:01 EDT
[asa] a creationist on the hiddenness of God
Ted Davis
Thu May 07 2009 - 12:50:18 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
Jon Tandy
Thu May 07 2009 - 12:24:41 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
Jon Tandy
Thu May 07 2009 - 12:08:12 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu May 07 2009 - 11:16:18 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
mrb22667@kansas.net
Thu May 07 2009 - 10:32:11 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
Dehler, Bernie
Thu May 07 2009 - 10:13:14 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
Dehler, Bernie
Thu May 07 2009 - 09:54:37 EDT
Re: [asa] Is God a big meanie?
Dave Wallace
Thu May 07 2009 - 06:53:20 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
Merv Bitikofer
Thu May 07 2009 - 06:47:35 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
Gregory Arago
Thu May 07 2009 - 00:18:14 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
IW
Wed May 06 2009 - 19:20:16 EDT
Re: [asa] natural theology, bad and good
George Murphy
Wed May 06 2009 - 18:45:39 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
Murray Hogg
Wed May 06 2009 - 18:15:19 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 06 2009 - 18:10:55 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
Michael Roberts
Wed May 06 2009 - 16:05:54 EDT
[asa] natural theology, bad and good
David Campbell
Wed May 06 2009 - 14:51:03 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (racism)
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 06 2009 - 14:11:22 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
George Murphy
Wed May 06 2009 - 13:29:04 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
Michael Roberts
Wed May 06 2009 - 13:20:00 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
George Murphy
Wed May 06 2009 - 13:02:13 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 06 2009 - 12:58:33 EDT
RE: [asa] No Adam?
Dehler, Bernie
Wed May 06 2009 - 12:24:17 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Wed May 06 2009 - 12:21:12 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Wed May 06 2009 - 10:42:55 EDT
[asa] Hubble's Nobel?
George Murphy
Wed May 06 2009 - 09:58:41 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Wed May 06 2009 - 00:20:23 EDT
Re: [asa] costs of "doing something"
William Hamilton
Tue May 05 2009 - 21:18:08 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
IW
Tue May 05 2009 - 19:14:57 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
George Murphy
Tue May 05 2009 - 17:44:46 EDT
Re: [asa] Is God a big meanie?
Merv Bitikofer
Tue May 05 2009 - 17:36:17 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
George Murphy
Tue May 05 2009 - 16:32:01 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
Gregory Arago
Tue May 05 2009 - 15:16:35 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
George Murphy
Tue May 05 2009 - 14:53:21 EDT
Re: [asa] Is God a big meanie?
Bethany Sollereder
Tue May 05 2009 - 14:54:24 EDT
Re: [asa] Is God a big meanie?
Jack
Tue May 05 2009 - 14:32:07 EDT
Re: [asa] Is God a big meanie?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Tue May 05 2009 - 14:28:11 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions (OT and NT God)
Dehler, Bernie
Tue May 05 2009 - 14:25:51 EDT
[asa] RE: Is God a big meanie?
Dehler, Bernie
Tue May 05 2009 - 14:21:31 EDT
[asa] RE: Is God a big meanie?
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue May 05 2009 - 14:10:00 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue May 05 2009 - 13:10:02 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
Ted Davis
Tue May 05 2009 - 12:43:51 EDT
RE: [asa] No Adam?
Dehler, Bernie
Tue May 05 2009 - 12:28:24 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
Gregory Arago
Tue May 05 2009 - 11:51:01 EDT
[asa] Is God a big meanie?
Dehler, Bernie
Tue May 05 2009 - 11:21:33 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
Dick Fischer
Tue May 05 2009 - 11:07:12 EDT
Re: [asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
Bill Powers
Tue May 05 2009 - 09:58:50 EDT
[asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
Dave Wallace
Tue May 05 2009 - 10:07:57 EDT
Re: [asa] what is a theologian?
Ted Davis
Tue May 05 2009 - 09:52:46 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Tue May 05 2009 - 09:47:35 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Tue May 05 2009 - 08:07:52 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
Merv Bitikofer
Tue May 05 2009 - 06:28:05 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
dawson wayne
Tue May 05 2009 - 04:43:45 EDT
[asa] serious humor: on Barth
dawson wayne
Tue May 05 2009 - 02:30:01 EDT
[asa] an Archimedean point in theology? (was: natural theology, bad and good)
Cameron Wybrow
Tue May 05 2009 - 01:56:04 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
philtill@aol.com
Mon May 04 2009 - 22:16:09 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
gordon brown
Mon May 04 2009 - 21:22:16 EDT
[asa] what is a theologian?
Cameron Wybrow
Mon May 04 2009 - 21:19:04 EDT
RE: [asa] No Adam?
Dick Fischer
Mon May 04 2009 - 18:52:16 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
Ted Davis
Mon May 04 2009 - 18:44:21 EDT
Re: [asa] dembski and YEC
Freeman, Louise Margaret
Mon May 04 2009 - 18:12:27 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
David Campbell
Mon May 04 2009 - 17:56:12 EDT
Re: [asa] dembski and YEC
David Campbell
Mon May 04 2009 - 17:46:58 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
Ted Davis
Mon May 04 2009 - 17:26:37 EDT
Re: [asa] Storming Young-Earth Creationism
David Campbell
Mon May 04 2009 - 17:16:08 EDT
Re: [asa] question about Eve and DNA
David Campbell
Mon May 04 2009 - 16:58:51 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
David Campbell
Mon May 04 2009 - 16:49:46 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
Gregory Arago
Mon May 04 2009 - 15:24:44 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
Michael Roberts
Mon May 04 2009 - 15:11:46 EDT
Re: [asa] YEC quiz
Michael Roberts
Mon May 04 2009 - 14:58:19 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
Murray Hogg
Mon May 04 2009 - 14:00:28 EDT
[asa] question about Eve and DNA
Ted Davis
Mon May 04 2009 - 13:43:10 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
Ted Davis
Mon May 04 2009 - 12:55:02 EDT
Re: RE: [asa] No Adam?
dickfischer@verizon.net
Mon May 04 2009 - 11:50:09 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
George Murphy
Mon May 04 2009 - 11:17:30 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Mon May 04 2009 - 10:47:08 EDT
[asa] YEC quiz
Ted Davis
Mon May 04 2009 - 10:29:05 EDT
RE: [asa] No Adam?
Dehler, Bernie
Mon May 04 2009 - 10:28:06 EDT
RE: [asa] No Adam?
Dehler, Bernie
Mon May 04 2009 - 10:25:33 EDT
RE: [asa] No Adam?
Dehler, Bernie
Mon May 04 2009 - 10:20:15 EDT
RE: [asa] No Adam?
Dehler, Bernie
Mon May 04 2009 - 10:12:19 EDT
Re: [asa] Confirmation bias
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Mon May 04 2009 - 08:57:03 EDT
Re: [asa] Confirmation bias among GW dissenters
Ted Davis
Mon May 04 2009 - 08:03:58 EDT
[asa] Ditchkins
Dave Wallace
Sun May 03 2009 - 23:39:51 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
philtill@aol.com
Sun May 03 2009 - 19:49:50 EDT
Re: [asa] Confirmation bias among GW dissenters
Rich Blinne
Sun May 03 2009 - 07:43:54 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
George Murphy
Sun May 03 2009 - 07:26:43 EDT
[asa] natural theology, good and bad
George Murphy
Sun May 03 2009 - 01:23:34 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
Cameron Wybrow
Sat May 02 2009 - 22:00:31 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
gordon brown
Sat May 02 2009 - 21:08:52 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
Merv Bitikofer
Sat May 02 2009 - 20:22:06 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
philtill@aol.com
Sat May 02 2009 - 18:52:03 EDT
[asa] Re No Adam
Jim Armstrong
Sat May 02 2009 - 18:20:53 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
Jim Armstrong
Sat May 02 2009 - 17:31:38 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
Murray Hogg
Sat May 02 2009 - 15:27:29 EDT
Re: [asa]
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Sat May 02 2009 - 11:49:42 EDT
Re: [asa]
Rich Blinne
Sat May 02 2009 - 11:41:41 EDT
Re: [asa] Answering questions
dawson wayne
Sat May 02 2009 - 10:57:40 EDT
Re: [asa]
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Sat May 02 2009 - 10:52:46 EDT
Re: [asa] dembski and YEC
Bill Powers
Sat May 02 2009 - 10:49:40 EDT
Re: [asa] dembski and YEC
Bill Powers
Sat May 02 2009 - 10:08:51 EDT
Re: [asa] dembski and YEC
Dave Wallace
Sat May 02 2009 - 10:06:35 EDT
[asa] RealClimate.org
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Sat May 02 2009 - 10:00:22 EDT
Re: [asa] Storming Young-Earth Creationism
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Sat May 02 2009 - 09:56:55 EDT
[asa] comment
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Sat May 02 2009 - 03:55:53 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
Gregory Arago
Sat May 02 2009 - 01:08:21 EDT
Re: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
philtill@aol.com
Sat May 02 2009 - 00:49:02 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
philtill@aol.com
Sat May 02 2009 - 00:27:42 EDT
[asa] dembski and YEC
Cameron Wybrow
Fri May 01 2009 - 22:13:53 EDT
[asa] Answering questions
Nucacids
Fri May 01 2009 - 21:47:41 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
Murray Hogg
Fri May 01 2009 - 21:32:10 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
gordon brown
Fri May 01 2009 - 21:03:29 EDT
Re: [asa] Storming Young-Earth Creationism
John Walley
Fri May 01 2009 - 19:04:10 EDT
RE: [asa] No Adam?
Dick Fischer
Fri May 01 2009 - 19:03:38 EDT
Re: [asa] a little quiz about YEC
Murray Hogg
Fri May 01 2009 - 18:53:03 EDT
[asa] One more candidate for imago dei bites the dust, dancing
Jack
Fri May 01 2009 - 16:28:22 EDT
Re: [asa] spoiler alert ... a little quiz about YEC
Rich Blinne
Fri May 01 2009 - 16:14:54 EDT
Re: [asa] Explainability of hydrogen atom
George Murphy
Fri May 01 2009 - 16:10:11 EDT
RE: [asa] a little quiz about YEC
d.nield@auckland.ac.nz
Fri May 01 2009 - 16:05:50 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
George Murphy
Fri May 01 2009 - 16:02:22 EDT
Re: [asa]
Rich Blinne
Fri May 01 2009 - 15:40:53 EDT
[asa] costs of "doing something"
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Fri May 01 2009 - 15:06:15 EDT
RE: [asa] a little quiz about YEC
Jon Tandy
Fri May 01 2009 - 15:00:58 EDT
Re: [asa] a little quiz about YEC
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Fri May 01 2009 - 14:35:41 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: Confirmation bias among GW dissenters, but ...
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Fri May 01 2009 - 14:13:21 EDT
Re: [asa] a little quiz about YEC
Douglas Hayworth
Fri May 01 2009 - 14:07:25 EDT
RE: [asa] Explainability of hydrogen atom
Dehler, Bernie
Fri May 01 2009 - 13:57:17 EDT
[asa] Explainability of hydrogen atom
wjp
Fri May 01 2009 - 13:22:39 EDT
Re: [asa] No Adam?
dickfischer@verizon.net
Fri May 01 2009 - 13:19:58 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (more info)
Iain Strachan
Fri May 01 2009 - 12:36:14 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (more info)
Michael Roberts
Fri May 01 2009 - 12:31:54 EDT
[asa] No Adam?
Dehler, Bernie
Fri May 01 2009 - 12:19:25 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (more info)
George Murphy
Fri May 01 2009 - 12:03:04 EDT
RE: [asa]("Darwinism") restatement on ID as a "proof" of God (defense of Behe)
Dehler, Bernie
Fri May 01 2009 - 12:02:36 EDT
RE: [asa] fall of Satan logic questions
Dehler, Bernie
Fri May 01 2009 - 11:55:39 EDT
RE: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (more info)
Dehler, Bernie
Fri May 01 2009 - 11:47:20 EDT
Re: [asa] a little quiz about YEC
mrb22667@kansas.net
Fri May 01 2009 - 11:19:05 EDT
Re: [asa] a little quiz about YEC
Michael Roberts
Fri May 01 2009 - 11:06:40 EDT
[asa] a little quiz about YEC
Ted Davis
Fri May 01 2009 - 10:46:56 EDT
Re: [asa] Storming Young-Earth Creationism
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Fri May 01 2009 - 10:14:58 EDT
Re: [asa]
John Burgeson (ASA member)
Fri May 01 2009 - 09:50:56 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (more info)
wjp
Fri May 01 2009 - 09:04:54 EDT
[asa] Re: Ontology determines epistemology (was Re: [asa] Re: Coyne vs Collins)
wjp
Fri May 01 2009 - 03:43:26 EDT
Re: [asa] ID/Miracles/Design (more info)
Iain Strachan
Fri May 01 2009 - 02:14:47 EDT
[asa] Re: natural theology, bad and good
Cameron Wybrow
Last message date
:
Sun May 31 2009 - 21:05:25 EDT
Archived on
: Sun May 31 2009 - 21:05:25 EDT
641 messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [
subject
] [
attachment
]
Nearby
: [
Other mail archives
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.1.8
: Sun May 31 2009 - 21:05:25 EDT