Comment here just on one sentence of Dick's below. I don't mean to pick on him but the phrase"sin nature" has been used by others here & should be avoided. If we're going to use the idea of humans having a distinctive "human nature" at all, the idea that this is a "sin nature" would mean that before regeneration people are no longer in essence good creations of God. That is why the 1st article of the Formula of Concord rejected such language. (Augustine said that even in the devil is in essence good.)
Shalom
George
http://home.neo.rr.com/scitheologyglm
----- Original Message -----
From: Dick Fischer
To: ASA
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: [asa] Bloesch on the Fall (was "Adam and the Fall")
..............
Man has a sin nature and so far as I can tell has always had it. asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
.............
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Nov 16 20:47:12 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 16 2008 - 20:47:12 EST