[asa] Re: [asa] Review of “Adam's Ancestors” by David Livingstone

Steve,

Thanks for mentioning this. That link didn't work for me but I did find it at: http://www.christianitytoday.com/bc/2008/006/4.39.html .

I agree that is surprisingly progressive for CT and something the church needs to start grappling with. I fear it will split the church though instead. It is a theological bridge too far.

Thanks

John

--- On Sun, 11/9/08, Steve Martin <steven.dale.martin@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Steve Martin <steven.dale.martin@gmail.com>
> Subject: [asa] Review of “Adam's Ancestors” by David Livingstone
> To: "AmericanScientificAffiliation" <asa@calvin.edu>
> Date: Sunday, November 9, 2008, 5:32 PM
> Personally, I find the historical development of science /
> philosophy of
> science / interaction of theology and science as
> interesting (or maybe even
> more interesting) than the topics themselves. David
> Livingstone's
> "Darwin's Forgotten Defenders" has been
> mentioned at various times on this
> list & IMHO it should be required reading for anyone
> studying the
> interaction of Darwin's theory and orthodox Christian
> Faith. So, I'm really
> looking forward to his new book "Adam's
> Ancestors". Has anyone here read
> it yet? Any comments?
>
> Christianity Today has a review of the book here
> <http://www.christianitytoday.com/bc/2008/006/4.39.html%20>(HT
> Geoff Bagley
> from the CIS list). Interestingly, it is reviewed by
> Michael Ruse, a well
> known atheist – but one who doesn't participate in
> the aggressive rancor of
> the New Atheists . Pretty progressive of CT I think.
>
> --
> Steve Martin (CSCA)

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Nov 9 19:55:27 2008