ASA - September 2008 By Thread
- [asa] Rejoinder 3B: Reply to David Opderbeck Ted Davis (Tue Sep 30 2008 - 14:11:56 EDT)
- [asa] A question for Timaeus Iain Strachan (Tue Sep 30 2008 - 07:43:11 EDT)
- [asa] Snow is falling on Mars George Cooper (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 22:50:38 EDT)
- [asa] For Timaeus, on deism and divine action Ted Davis (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 21:53:18 EDT)
- [asa] Cobb, Coyne, Collins, Gingerich, Davis Austerberry, Charles (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 17:52:47 EDT)
- [asa] Rejoinder 3 from Timaeus: to Don Nield; major statement re Denton Ted Davis (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 15:33:37 EDT)
- [asa] Rejoinder 2D from Timaeus: to Dennis Venema Ted Davis (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 15:21:24 EDT)
- [asa] Rejoinder 2E from Timaeus: to Randy Isaac Ted Davis (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 15:14:23 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus D. F. Siemens, Jr. (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 14:59:04 EDT)
- [asa] Rejoinder 2C from Timaeus: to Allan Harvey Ted Davis (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 14:55:46 EDT)
- "TE theology" (was Re: [asa] RE: [asa] Timaeus’ challenge to TE) gmurphy10@neo.rr.com (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 13:07:45 EDT)
- [asa] Timaeus’ challenge to TE Gregory Arago (Sun Sep 28 2008 - 18:36:37 EDT)
- [asa] Nature editorial on Reiss affair Keith Miller (Sat Sep 27 2008 - 13:14:21 EDT)
- [asa] seminar on science, philosophy & Structural Realism; Oct. 3, 3:30 Loren Haarsma (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 15:24:53 EDT)
- [asa] Letter to Nature in response to claim that science implies atheism Ted Davis (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 10:33:11 EDT)
- [asa] Rejoinder 2B from Timaeus – to Don Nield Ted Davis (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 09:34:29 EDT)
- [asa] Rejoinder 2 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck, with a Question for All Ted Davis (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 09:29:28 EDT)
- [asa] Of Stars and Starfish (divine creative action, from Timaeus thread) SteamDoc@aol.com (Wed Sep 24 2008 - 22:26:32 EDT)
- [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al. Ted Davis (Wed Sep 24 2008 - 09:48:57 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al. David Opderbeck (Wed Sep 24 2008 - 10:44:40 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al. D. F. Siemens, Jr. (Wed Sep 24 2008 - 14:41:14 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al. Don Nield (Thu Sep 25 2008 - 00:34:38 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al. Christine Smith (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 13:40:47 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al. Nucacids (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 19:40:04 EDT)
- [asa] Near-Death Experience Article Christine Smith (Wed Sep 24 2008 - 09:21:46 EDT)
- [asa] Neanderthal Show on NGC David Opderbeck (Tue Sep 23 2008 - 22:25:01 EDT)
- [asa] Look Who's Irrational Now Nucacids (Tue Sep 23 2008 - 21:50:19 EDT)
- [asa] Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowships Jack Haas (Tue Sep 23 2008 - 17:42:29 EDT)
- [asa] Rejoinder 1 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck and Ted Davis Ted Davis (Tue Sep 23 2008 - 11:34:54 EDT)
- [asa] Fw: DRAFT: ATL RTB Chapter Meeting - Thursday September 25th - , Dr. Ian Ferguson: "A Simplified Apologetics: What is the point if we lose the focus?" John Walley (Mon Sep 22 2008 - 18:50:05 EDT)
- [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one Ted Davis (Mon Sep 22 2008 - 15:35:54 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one Ted Davis (Mon Sep 22 2008 - 16:01:57 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one David Opderbeck (Mon Sep 22 2008 - 16:09:34 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one Dennis Venema (Mon Sep 22 2008 - 16:28:40 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one D. F. Siemens, Jr. (Mon Sep 22 2008 - 17:36:01 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one Merv (Mon Sep 22 2008 - 21:54:11 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one Nucacids (Mon Sep 22 2008 - 22:47:17 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one Christine Smith (Mon Sep 22 2008 - 23:35:23 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one Jack Syme (Tue Sep 23 2008 - 05:40:34 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one gmurphy10@neo.rr.com (Tue Sep 23 2008 - 12:39:39 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one SteamDoc@aol.com (Tue Sep 23 2008 - 22:52:28 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one William Hamilton (Wed Sep 24 2008 - 15:51:08 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one gmurphy10@neo.rr.com (Wed Sep 24 2008 - 17:59:39 EDT)
- RE: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one James Patterson (Thu Sep 25 2008 - 07:39:15 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one Randy Isaac (Thu Sep 25 2008 - 15:38:12 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one D. F. Siemens, Jr. (Thu Sep 25 2008 - 16:43:19 EDT)
- RE: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus Jon Tandy (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 03:26:59 EDT)
- [asa] Invitation to conversation with Timaeus Ted Davis (Mon Sep 22 2008 - 14:24:26 EDT)
- [asa] sea urchins Randy Isaac (Sat Sep 20 2008 - 16:29:07 EDT)
- [asa] Nick Matzke: Mark Pallen on Namba on the flagellum/ATPase homologies…and me PvM (Fri Sep 19 2008 - 22:47:08 EDT)
- [asa] meteorites in the geologic column Randy Isaac (Fri Sep 19 2008 - 15:46:46 EDT)
- [asa] Very first image of exoplanet around Sun-like star George Cooper (Fri Sep 19 2008 - 09:56:41 EDT)
- Taking the Religion of Scientism to a new level Re: [asa] This is seriously funny Steve Martin (Fri Sep 19 2008 - 08:27:04 EDT)
- [asa] This is seriously funny James Patterson (Fri Sep 19 2008 - 07:02:35 EDT)
- [asa] Microevolution Jon Tandy (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 23:38:43 EDT)
- [asa] Loop Gravity David Opderbeck (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 22:32:55 EDT)
- [asa] physics questions George Murphy (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 08:47:41 EDT)
- [asa] Physics poser Jim Armstrong (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 22:33:21 EDT)
- [asa] Space trivia II George Cooper (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 21:40:54 EDT)
- [asa] Recognizing Religion, Translation & Transformation Gregory Arago (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 18:42:33 EDT)
- [asa] Michael Reiss and Royal Society: Shame on them Ted Davis (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 10:30:07 EDT)
- [asa] Creation "waters" George Cooper (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 10:05:42 EDT)
- [asa] Faraday Resource for Churches David Opderbeck (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 10:01:22 EDT)
- [asa] H Allen Orr Chris Barden (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 11:41:08 EDT)
- [asa] RE: asa-digest V1 #9143 Austerberry, Charles (Mon Sep 15 2008 - 10:43:53 EDT)
- [asa] Swiss proton frenzy (or, are you ready to meet God?) Murray Hogg (Mon Sep 15 2008 - 01:14:01 EDT)
- [asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb David Opderbeck (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 22:27:23 EDT)
- [asa] The Social Psychology of the Origins Debate Steve Martin (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 11:24:38 EDT)
- [asa] LHC Randy Isaac (Fri Sep 12 2008 - 16:52:05 EDT)
- Re: [asa] ? about peer review Lynn Walker (Thu Sep 11 2008 - 17:19:02 EDT)
- [asa] Re: The Hockey Stick Holds Up j burg (Thu Sep 11 2008 - 14:20:51 EDT)
- Re: [asa] serious talk about ID and TE David Campbell (Thu Sep 11 2008 - 13:31:53 EDT)
- [asa] Dialup survey j burg (Thu Sep 11 2008 - 10:09:20 EDT)
- [asa] Providence? George Murphy (Wed Sep 10 2008 - 22:35:52 EDT)
- [asa] Providence? James Patterson (Wed Sep 10 2008 - 22:04:58 EDT)
- [asa] Forums? James Patterson (Wed Sep 10 2008 - 21:39:26 EDT)
- [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Iain Strachan (Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:47:39 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge David Clounch (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 00:40:08 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Don Winterstein (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 02:45:58 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Alexanian, Moorad (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 08:39:26 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge David Clounch (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 12:39:18 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Alexanian, Moorad (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 15:00:09 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Don Winterstein (Mon Sep 15 2008 - 04:45:37 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Alexanian, Moorad (Mon Sep 15 2008 - 09:00:53 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Alexanian, Moorad (Mon Sep 15 2008 - 14:04:33 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge William Hamilton (Sun Sep 14 2008 - 19:52:37 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Don Winterstein (Mon Sep 15 2008 - 04:57:36 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Dehler, Bernie (Mon Sep 15 2008 - 12:52:34 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Don Winterstein (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 03:01:34 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Dehler, Bernie (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 11:41:58 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge j burg (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 11:52:47 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Randy Isaac (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 14:02:29 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Rich Blinne (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 15:19:29 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Kirk Bertsche (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 16:13:48 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Dehler, Bernie (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 17:07:06 EDT)
- [asa] Letter, Richard Dawkins on the Royal Society row Dehler, Bernie (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 18:05:59 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Letter, Richard Dawkins on the Royal Society row George Murphy (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 20:47:38 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Dehler, Bernie (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 17:01:00 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Randy Isaac (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 19:57:26 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Jon Tandy (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 21:17:32 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Merv (Tue Sep 16 2008 - 23:46:14 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Iain Strachan (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 03:32:30 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Don Winterstein (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 04:44:23 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge George Murphy (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 09:27:12 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge George Cooper (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 12:39:50 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge j burg (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 16:55:19 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Don Winterstein (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 02:48:36 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Don Winterstein (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 15:55:46 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Dehler, Bernie (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 15:07:18 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Don Winterstein (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 16:58:22 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Dehler, Bernie (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 16:25:10 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Don Winterstein (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 20:55:44 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Dehler, Bernie (Fri Sep 19 2008 - 11:12:01 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge j burg (Sat Sep 20 2008 - 14:46:24 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge George Murphy (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 16:25:00 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge George Murphy (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 17:23:09 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Don Nield (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 18:29:04 EDT)
- [asa] YEC question Dehler, Bernie (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 20:10:09 EDT)
- Re: [asa] YEC question David Campbell (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 11:31:36 EDT)
- RE: [asa] YEC question Dehler, Bernie (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 14:46:31 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Don Winterstein (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 04:53:08 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Dehler, Bernie (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 12:00:44 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge David Clounch (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 09:18:58 EDT)
- RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Dehler, Bernie (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 14:59:17 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge David Clounch (Sat Sep 20 2008 - 14:43:15 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (computer evolution) LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge Dehler, Bernie (Thu Sep 25 2008 - 18:19:35 EDT)
- [asa] writing DNA... Dehler, Bernie (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 13:03:02 EDT)
- RE: [asa] writing DNA... Dehler, Bernie (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 16:56:24 EDT)
- Re: [asa] writing DNA... Randy Isaac (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 19:15:04 EDT)
- Re: [asa] writing DNA... Preston Garrison (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 16:45:24 EDT)
- RE: [asa] writing DNA... Dehler, Bernie (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 19:49:28 EDT)
- Re: [asa] writing DNA... Nucacids (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 20:08:03 EDT)
- Re: [asa] writing DNA... John Walley (Fri Sep 26 2008 - 21:42:48 EDT)
- RE: [asa] writing DNA... Dehler, Bernie (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 00:45:59 EDT)
- Re: [asa] writing DNA... David Campbell (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 13:08:33 EDT)
- Re: [asa] writing DNA... Michael Roberts (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 13:20:42 EDT)
- Re: [asa] writing DNA... David Campbell (Mon Sep 29 2008 - 18:26:49 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge David Campbell (Thu Sep 18 2008 - 12:09:37 EDT)
- Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge George Cooper (Wed Sep 17 2008 - 21:16:30 EDT)
- [asa] The Hockey Stick Holds Up Rich Blinne (Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:45:08 EDT)
- [asa] Resource on Religion Clauses David Opderbeck (Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:32:46 EDT)
- [asa] Francis Beckwith on Dembski and Baylor David Opderbeck (Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:23:22 EDT)
- [asa] If you can read this... Steve Matheson (Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:08:07 EDT)
- [asa] Physics for Future Presidents j burg (Wed Sep 10 2008 - 10:32:57 EDT)
- [asa] Interesting web site Jack Syme (Wed Sep 10 2008 - 06:14:54 EDT)
- [asa] Greetings - An introduction james000777@bellsouth.net (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 12:31:36 EDT)
- [asa] Greetings - An introduction james000777@bellsouth.net (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 10:28:52 EDT)
- [asa] New page Vernon Jenkins (Mon Sep 08 2008 - 19:03:45 EDT)
- [asa] The Big Sleep Vernon Jenkins (Mon Sep 08 2008 - 18:56:56 EDT)
- [asa] "On the asa list no one can hear you scream - or can they?" George Murphy (Mon Sep 08 2008 - 16:56:41 EDT)
- [asa] Another Reason Design Arguments are Important David Opderbeck (Mon Sep 08 2008 - 12:31:11 EDT)
- [asa] Darwin Miracle David Opderbeck (Sat Sep 06 2008 - 19:51:11 EDT)
- [asa] Record Ice Loss in August Rich Blinne (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 12:36:23 EDT)
- [asa] Global Warming and creationism in the news j burg (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 09:40:09 EDT)
- [asa] News from Dawkins Dehler, Bernie (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 11:18:48 EDT)
- FW: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 16:56:49 EDT)
- [asa] ASA members invited to attend events sponsored by Central PA Forum for Religion and Science Ted Davis (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 15:12:02 EDT)
- [asa] John Cleese on science, religion & genetic determinism Loren Haarsma (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 11:20:07 EDT)
- RE: [asa] Rebuttals? IW (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 08:28:35 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Rebuttals? David Campbell (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 18:48:19 EDT)
- [asa] Discussion on Christology and Science Steve Martin (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 06:27:59 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Roger G. Olson (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 15:28:55 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:06:34 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:21:21 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Merv (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 12:50:45 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 14:37:57 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 14:55:09 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Merv (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 15:36:58 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 15:43:48 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Don Nield (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 17:13:22 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 20:31:04 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 21:21:21 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dick Fischer (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 21:50:12 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Alexanian, Moorad (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 07:55:43 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 18:03:51 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dick Fischer (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 11:29:24 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 12:00:10 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 01:09:14 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 10:19:04 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 10:51:10 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dick Fischer (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 11:52:57 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 13:28:10 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 13:49:45 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 14:16:03 EDT)
- [asa] Looking for a post skrogh. (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 15:09:22 EDT)
- Re: [asa] Looking for a post Ted Davis (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 16:54:02 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 16:38:59 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 17:01:29 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 17:16:26 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Don Nield (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 17:58:23 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 19:56:44 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 23:00:55 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 10:43:49 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 11:35:35 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 11:46:16 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Randy Isaac (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 11:52:14 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 11:59:38 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 12:05:41 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Keith Miller (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 17:33:10 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 17:47:03 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 18:00:54 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Merv (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 18:52:13 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 19:01:09 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? kbmill@ksu.edu (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 11:35:37 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 09:50:41 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 10:29:50 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 10:49:26 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 12:06:35 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 13:10:03 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 13:32:00 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 13:59:17 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 14:15:42 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 15:42:15 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 16:40:35 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 17:47:02 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 15:37:37 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Merv (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 18:22:04 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 18:58:26 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Merv (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 19:48:08 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 20:10:32 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 22:37:18 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Michael Roberts (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 02:21:13 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Ted Davis (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 07:58:24 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Loren Haarsma (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 08:09:00 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Merv (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 08:20:37 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam-logically inconsistent? Michael Roberts (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 11:50:14 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Randy Isaac (Thu Sep 04 2008 - 08:26:10 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 23:59:25 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? gordon brown (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 00:46:13 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 10:48:06 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 10:53:55 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:01:54 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:26:44 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:46:05 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 13:12:59 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 14:35:53 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 16:41:34 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? gordon brown (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 12:22:25 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 14:31:48 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Sat Sep 06 2008 - 13:30:22 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Bethany Sollereder (Sat Sep 06 2008 - 13:56:43 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dick Fischer (Sat Sep 06 2008 - 15:38:41 EDT)
- [asa] The end is near? LHC Dehler, Bernie (Mon Sep 08 2008 - 15:56:23 EDT)
- Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC Iain Strachan (Mon Sep 08 2008 - 17:11:53 EDT)
- Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC Don Winterstein (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 00:52:27 EDT)
- RE: [asa] The end is near? LHC Dehler, Bernie (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 02:39:33 EDT)
- Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC Jack Syme (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 06:09:42 EDT)
- Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC Michael Roberts (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 12:12:33 EDT)
- Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC j burg (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 17:06:28 EDT)
- Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC Michael Roberts (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 17:09:35 EDT)
- Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC Don Winterstein (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 01:49:28 EDT)
- RE: [asa] The end is near? LHC Alexanian, Moorad (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 16:22:16 EDT)
- RE: [asa] The end is near? LHC Jon Tandy (Wed Sep 10 2008 - 01:17:16 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Sat Sep 06 2008 - 16:24:49 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dick Fischer (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:39:33 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Michael Roberts (Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:35:06 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Sat Sep 06 2008 - 23:29:24 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dick Fischer (Mon Sep 08 2008 - 22:53:23 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 09:31:03 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 09:57:54 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dick Fischer (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 10:36:09 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 22:35:00 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Campbell (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 18:28:03 EDT)
- Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 19:50:32 EDT)
- RE: [asa] (amoeba) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 16:42:10 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 10:25:39 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? David Opderbeck (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 10:51:30 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dave Wallace (Tue Sep 02 2008 - 12:26:02 EDT)
- RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? Dehler, Bernie (Mon Sep 01 2008 - 14:25:55 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Wed Sep 03 2008 - 00:08:11 EDT)
- Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent? George Cooper (Tue Sep 09 2008 - 22:58:45 EDT)
- Last message date: Tue Sep 30 2008 - 22:36:11 EDT
- Archived on: Tue Sep 30 2008 - 22:36:12 EDT