ASA - September 2008 By Date
550 messages
:
Starting
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:07:14 EDT,
Ending
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 22:36:11 EDT
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [
subject
] [
attachment
]
Nearby
: [
Other mail archives
]
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 22:36:13 EDT
RE: [asa] Rejoinder 3B: Reply to David Opderbeck
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 22:34:25 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 3B: Reply to David Opderbeck
Steve Matheson
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 21:13:46 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 3B: Reply to David Opderbeck
Dennis Venema
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 19:52:41 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 3B: Reply to David Opderbeck
Gregory Arago
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 19:02:18 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 3B: Reply to David Opderbeck
Dennis Venema
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 18:16:48 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 3B: Reply to David Opderbeck
David Campbell
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 17:58:33 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 3B: Reply to David Opderbeck
Gregory Arago
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 15:11:37 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 3B: Reply to David Opderbeck
David Opderbeck
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 14:38:42 EDT
Re: [asa] Timaeus' challenge to TE
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 14:37:30 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 3B: Reply to David Opderbeck
Dennis Venema
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 14:11:56 EDT
[asa] Rejoinder 3B: Reply to David Opderbeck
Ted Davis
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 07:43:11 EDT
[asa] A question for Timaeus
Iain Strachan
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 23:48:40 EDT
Re: [asa] Timaeus' challenge to TE
Jim Armstrong
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 23:26:12 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2D from Timaeus: to Dennis Venema
Dennis Venema
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 23:13:29 EDT
Re: [asa] For Timaeus, on deism and divine action
David Opderbeck
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 22:50:38 EDT
[asa] Snow is falling on Mars
George Cooper
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 21:53:18 EDT
[asa] For Timaeus, on deism and divine action
Ted Davis
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 21:05:31 EDT
RE: [asa] Timaeus' challenge to TE
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 19:40:46 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2D from Timaeus: to Dennis Venema
Merv
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 18:26:49 EDT
Re: [asa] writing DNA...
David Campbell
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 17:53:03 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2D from Timaeus: to Dennis Venema
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 17:52:47 EDT
[asa] Cobb, Coyne, Collins, Gingerich, Davis
Austerberry, Charles
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 17:23:10 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 3 from Timaeus: to Don Nield; major statement re Denton
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 17:20:22 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2D from Timaeus: to Dennis Venema
mrb22667@kansas.net
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 16:45:24 EDT
Re: [asa] writing DNA...
Preston Garrison
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 16:11:46 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 3 from Timaeus: to Don Nield; major statement re Denton
David Opderbeck
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 15:59:51 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2C from Timaeus: to Allan Harvey
j burg
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 15:56:01 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2C from Timaeus: to Allan Harvey
David Opderbeck
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 15:41:00 EDT
Re: [asa] Timaeus’#x2019; challenge to TE
j burg
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 15:33:37 EDT
[asa] Rejoinder 3 from Timaeus: to Don Nield; major statement re Denton
Ted Davis
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 15:21:24 EDT
[asa] Rejoinder 2D from Timaeus: to Dennis Venema
Ted Davis
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 15:14:23 EDT
[asa] Rejoinder 2E from Timaeus: to Randy Isaac
Ted Davis
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 14:59:04 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 14:55:46 EDT
[asa] Rejoinder 2C from Timaeus: to Allan Harvey
Ted Davis
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 13:36:08 EDT
Re: [asa] Timaeus’#x2019; challenge to TE
David Campbell
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 13:20:42 EDT
Re: [asa] writing DNA...
Michael Roberts
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 13:08:33 EDT
Re: [asa] writing DNA...
David Campbell
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 13:07:45 EDT
"TE theology" (was Re: [asa] RE: [asa] Timaeus’ challenge to TE)
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 07:09:44 EDT
[asa] RE: [asa] Timaeus’ challenge to TE
James Patterson
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 04:46:46 EDT
[asa] Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2B from Timaeus - to Don Nield
Nucacids
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 04:37:35 EDT
[asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2B from Timaeus – to Don Nield
Nucacids
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 04:31:07 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck, with a Questionfor All
Nucacids
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 03:26:59 EDT
RE: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus
Jon Tandy
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 01:56:02 EDT
RE: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Jon Tandy
Mon Sep 29 2008 - 00:45:59 EDT
RE: [asa] writing DNA...
Dehler, Bernie
Sun Sep 28 2008 - 21:12:32 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck, with a Questionfor All
Randy Isaac
Sun Sep 28 2008 - 19:16:38 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2B from Timaeus –#x2013; to Don Nield
David Opderbeck
Sun Sep 28 2008 - 18:36:37 EDT
[asa] Timaeus’ challenge to TE
Gregory Arago
Sun Sep 28 2008 - 16:14:53 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2B from Timaeus – to Don Nield
Don Nield
Sun Sep 28 2008 - 12:27:04 EDT
[asa] Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2B from Timaeus – to Don Nield
Nucacids
Sat Sep 27 2008 - 16:16:44 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck, with a Question for All
SteamDoc@aol.com
Sat Sep 27 2008 - 13:14:21 EDT
[asa] Nature editorial on Reiss affair
Keith Miller
Sat Sep 27 2008 - 09:50:17 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck, with a Question for All
Merv
Sat Sep 27 2008 - 01:37:13 EDT
Re: [asa] Of Stars and Starfish (divine creative action, from Timaeus thread)
George Cooper
Sat Sep 27 2008 - 00:25:03 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2B from Timaeus – to Don Nield
Don Nield
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 21:42:48 EDT
Re: [asa] writing DNA...
John Walley
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 20:08:03 EDT
Re: [asa] writing DNA...
Nucacids
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 19:49:28 EDT
RE: [asa] writing DNA...
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 19:40:04 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al.
Nucacids
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 19:15:04 EDT
Re: [asa] writing DNA...
Randy Isaac
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 16:56:24 EDT
RE: [asa] writing DNA...
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 15:24:53 EDT
[asa] seminar on science, philosophy & Structural Realism; Oct. 3, 3:30
Loren Haarsma
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 13:40:47 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al.
Christine Smith
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 13:26:41 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck, with a Question for All
Dennis Venema
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 13:03:02 EDT
[asa] writing DNA...
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 12:39:28 EDT
Re: [asa] Of Stars and Starfish (divine creative action, from Timaeus thread)
David Campbell
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 10:35:42 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck, with a Question for All
David Opderbeck
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 10:33:38 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 2 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck, with a Question for All
David Opderbeck
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 10:33:11 EDT
[asa] Letter to Nature in response to claim that science implies atheism
Ted Davis
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 09:34:29 EDT
[asa] Rejoinder 2B from Timaeus – to Don Nield
Ted Davis
Fri Sep 26 2008 - 09:29:28 EDT
[asa] Rejoinder 2 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck, with a Question for All
Ted Davis
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 20:18:13 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Nucacids
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 18:19:35 EDT
RE: [asa] (computer evolution) LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 18:17:44 EDT
Re: [asa] Of Stars and Starfish (divine creative action, from Timaeus thread)
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 17:53:44 EDT
RE: [asa] Of Stars and Starfish (divine creative action, from Timaeus thread)
George Cooper
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 17:36:04 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Steve Martin
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 16:43:19 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 16:06:41 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
j burg
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 15:38:12 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Randy Isaac
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 15:23:06 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Ted Davis
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 13:59:01 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
PvM
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 13:32:19 EDT
Re: [asa] Look Who's Irrational Now
PvM
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 12:07:13 EDT
Re: [asa] Of Stars and Starfish (divine creative action, from Timaeus thread)
David Campbell
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 07:39:15 EDT
RE: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
James Patterson
Thu Sep 25 2008 - 00:34:38 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al.
Don Nield
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 22:26:32 EDT
[asa] Of Stars and Starfish (divine creative action, from Timaeus thread)
SteamDoc@aol.com
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 17:59:39 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 15:51:08 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
William Hamilton
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 14:41:14 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al.
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 12:29:47 EDT
Re: [asa] Look Who's Irrational Now
d.nield@auckland.ac.nz
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 11:32:42 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al.
Dennis Venema
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 10:44:40 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al.
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 09:48:57 EDT
[asa] Rejoinder 1B from Timaeus: to Mike Gene, Jack Syme, et al.
Ted Davis
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 09:48:32 EDT
Re: [asa] Look Who's Irrational Now
j burg
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 09:21:46 EDT
[asa] Near-Death Experience Article
Christine Smith
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 09:04:00 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Gregory Arago
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 05:50:50 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
George Murphy
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 02:42:35 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Gregory Arago
Wed Sep 24 2008 - 02:32:46 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Michael Roberts
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 22:52:28 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
SteamDoc@aol.com
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 22:25:01 EDT
[asa] Neanderthal Show on NGC
David Opderbeck
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 21:50:19 EDT
[asa] Look Who's Irrational Now
Nucacids
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 21:44:31 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Nucacids
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 21:23:26 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
George Murphy
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 21:07:08 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Nucacids
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 19:15:53 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: microevolution (Baraminology)
David Campbell
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 17:51:07 EDT
Re: Behe vs "Pandas" on Common Descent (was Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck and Ted Davis)
Dennis Venema
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 17:42:29 EDT
[asa] Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowships
Jack Haas
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 16:28:29 EDT
Behe vs "Pandas" on Common Descent (was Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck and Ted Davis)
Murray Hogg
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 16:08:02 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Gregory Arago
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 12:39:39 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 12:15:09 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck and Ted Davis
Randy Isaac
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 11:55:36 EDT
Re: [asa] Rejoinder 1 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck and Ted Davis
David Opderbeck
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 11:34:54 EDT
[asa] Rejoinder 1 from Timaeus: to David Opderbeck and Ted Davis
Ted Davis
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 11:11:23 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
j burg
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 11:06:44 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
George Murphy
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 11:01:34 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
George Murphy
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 11:01:46 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
j burg
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 10:59:16 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
David Opderbeck
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 10:44:06 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Ted Davis
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 08:20:04 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Gregory Arago
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 07:18:32 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
George Murphy
Tue Sep 23 2008 - 05:40:34 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Jack Syme
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 23:49:08 EDT
Re: [asa] Fw: DRAFT: ATL RTB Chapter Meeting - Thursday September 25th - , Dr. Ian Ferguson: "A Simplified Apologetics: What is the point if we lose the focus?"
PvM
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 23:35:23 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Christine Smith
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 23:20:12 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Nucacids
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 22:47:17 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Nucacids
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 22:37:12 EDT
RE: [asa] Re: microevolution (Baraminology)
Duff,Robert Joel
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 22:23:26 EDT
Re: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
gordon brown
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 21:54:11 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Merv
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 19:13:11 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
George Murphy
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 18:50:05 EDT
[asa] Fw: DRAFT: ATL RTB Chapter Meeting - Thursday September 25th - , Dr. Ian Ferguson: "A Simplified Apologetics: What is the point if we lose the focus?"
John Walley
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 18:12:14 EDT
Re: [asa] sea urchins
David Campbell
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 17:36:01 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 16:57:13 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
j burg
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 16:28:40 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Dennis Venema
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 16:09:34 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
David Opderbeck
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 16:01:57 EDT
Re: [asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Ted Davis
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 15:35:54 EDT
[asa] Conversation with Timaeus, part one
Ted Davis
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 14:57:11 EDT
Re: [asa] Invitation to conversation with Timaeus
Randy Isaac
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 14:51:22 EDT
Re: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
Randy Isaac
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 14:24:26 EDT
[asa] Invitation to conversation with Timaeus
Ted Davis
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 14:20:48 EDT
Re: [asa] sea urchins
David Campbell
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 14:00:20 EDT
Re: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
David Campbell
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 11:23:53 EDT
RE: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
George Cooper
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 11:58:15 EDT
RE: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
George Cooper
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 11:39:43 EDT
Re: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
Randy Isaac
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 11:29:19 EDT
Re: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
Jim Armstrong
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 11:21:27 EDT
Re: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
George Murphy
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 10:56:12 EDT
Re: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
Randy Isaac
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 10:52:25 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: microevolution (Baraminology)
cmekve@aol.com
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 10:15:16 EDT
Re: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
Michael Roberts
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 10:01:49 EDT
Re: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
Randy Isaac
Mon Sep 22 2008 - 08:44:04 EDT
RE: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
George Cooper
Sun Sep 21 2008 - 22:15:04 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Nick Matzke: Mark Pallen on Namba on the flagellum/ATPase homologies.and me
PvM
Sun Sep 21 2008 - 17:34:15 EDT
[asa] Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Nick Matzke: Mark Pallen on Namba on the flagellum/ATPase homologies.and me
Nucacids
Sun Sep 21 2008 - 16:14:33 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: [asa] Nick Matzke: Mark Pallen on Namba on the flagellum/ATPase homologies…#x2026;and me
PvM
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 20:04:24 EDT
Re: [asa] sea urchins
Jim Armstrong
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 17:02:11 EDT
Re: [asa] Microevolution
George Murphy
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 16:29:07 EDT
[asa] sea urchins
Randy Isaac
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 15:51:17 EDT
RE: [asa] Microevolution
Gregory Arago
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 14:46:24 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
j burg
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 14:43:15 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
David Clounch
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 13:17:28 EDT
[asa] Re: [asa] Nick Matzke: Mark Pallen on Namba on the flagellum/ATPase homologies…and me
Nucacids
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 12:50:52 EDT
RE: [asa] Re: microevolution (Baraminology)
Steve Matheson
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 12:41:56 EDT
RE: [asa] Microevolution
gmurphy10@neo.rr.com
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 11:33:41 EDT
RE: [asa] Re: microevolution (Baraminology)
Jon Tandy
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 11:23:24 EDT
RE: [asa] Microevolution
Jon Tandy
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 05:22:51 EDT
Re: [asa] Microevolution
Gregory Arago
Sat Sep 20 2008 - 01:07:22 EDT
Re: [asa] serious talk about ID and TE
PvM
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 23:25:06 EDT
Re: [asa] Microevolution
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 22:47:08 EDT
[asa] Nick Matzke: Mark Pallen on Namba on the flagellum/ATPase homologies…and me
PvM
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 22:40:01 EDT
Re: [asa] Microevolution
gordon brown
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 16:24:21 EDT
RE: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
George Cooper
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 15:57:01 EDT
Re: [asa] meteorites in the geologic column
Michael Roberts
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 15:46:46 EDT
[asa] meteorites in the geologic column
Randy Isaac
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 14:56:22 EDT
[asa] Re: microevolution (Baraminology)
Duff,Robert Joel
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 12:24:38 EDT
RE: Taking the Religion of Scientism to a new level Re: [asa] This is seriously funny
George Cooper
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 11:35:51 EDT
Re: [asa] physics questions
David Campbell
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 11:25:36 EDT
Re: [asa] Loop Gravity
George Murphy
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 11:17:58 EDT
Re: [asa] Loop Gravity
David Campbell
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 11:12:01 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 10:03:11 EDT
RE: [asa] Microevolution
Jon Tandy
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 09:56:41 EDT
[asa] Very first image of exoplanet around Sun-like star
George Cooper
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 09:18:44 EDT
Re: Taking the Religion of Scientism to a new level Re: [asa] This is seriously funny
George Murphy
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 09:05:58 EDT
RE: Taking the Religion of Scientism to a new level Re: [asa] This is seriously funny
George Cooper
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 08:27:04 EDT
Taking the Religion of Scientism to a new level Re: [asa] This is seriously funny
Steve Martin
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 07:54:55 EDT
Re: [asa] Microevolution
George Murphy
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 07:22:24 EDT
Re: [asa] Microevolution
Gregory Arago
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 07:02:35 EDT
[asa] This is seriously funny
James Patterson
Fri Sep 19 2008 - 00:26:18 EDT
Re: [asa] Microevolution
gordon brown
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 23:38:43 EDT
[asa] Microevolution
Jon Tandy
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 22:32:55 EDT
[asa] Loop Gravity
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 20:55:44 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Don Winterstein
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 16:25:00 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
George Murphy
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 16:25:10 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 16:58:22 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Don Winterstein
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 15:07:18 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 14:59:17 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 15:55:46 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Don Winterstein
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 14:46:31 EDT
RE: [asa] YEC question
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 13:00:18 EDT
RE: [asa] physics questions (surf. brightness)
George Cooper
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 12:09:37 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
David Campbell
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 11:56:31 EDT
Re: [asa] physics questions (surf. brightness)
Jim Armstrong
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 11:31:36 EDT
Re: [asa] YEC question
David Campbell
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 09:18:58 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
David Clounch
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 09:15:06 EDT
RE: [asa] physics questions (surf. brightness)
George Cooper
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 08:47:41 EDT
[asa] physics questions
George Murphy
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 07:28:42 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence and ID
Dave Wallace
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 05:24:59 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence and ID
Gregory Arago
Thu Sep 18 2008 - 02:48:36 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Don Winterstein
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 23:22:54 EDT
Re: [asa] Physics poser
Don Nield
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 23:13:27 EDT
Re: [asa] Physics poser
muzhogg@netspace.net.au
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 22:33:21 EDT
[asa] Physics poser
Jim Armstrong
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 21:40:54 EDT
[asa] Space trivia II
George Cooper
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 21:16:30 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
George Cooper
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 20:10:09 EDT
[asa] YEC question
Dehler, Bernie
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 19:44:14 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence and ID
David Campbell
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 19:38:54 EDT
Re: [asa] Faraday Resource for Churches
John Walley
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 18:42:33 EDT
[asa] Recognizing Religion, Translation & Transformation
Gregory Arago
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 18:29:04 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Don Nield
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 17:23:09 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
George Murphy
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 17:07:44 EDT
FW: [asa] Creation "waters"
George Cooper
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 16:55:19 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
j burg
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 16:33:06 EDT
Re: [asa] Faraday Resource for Churches
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 15:25:34 EDT
Re: [asa] Faraday Resource for Churches
Murray Hogg
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 13:27:53 EDT
RE: [asa] Michael Reiss and Royal Society: Shame on them
Dehler, Bernie
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 12:48:13 EDT
Re: [asa] Michael Reiss and Royal Society: Shame on them
George Murphy
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 12:39:50 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
George Cooper
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 12:19:23 EDT
RE: [asa] Creation "waters"
Jon Tandy
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 12:00:44 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Dehler, Bernie
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 11:49:15 EDT
Re: [asa] Creation "waters"
Bethany Sollereder
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 10:40:50 EDT
Re: [asa] Michael Reiss and Royal Society: Shame on them
Michael Roberts
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 10:30:07 EDT
[asa] Michael Reiss and Royal Society: Shame on them
Ted Davis
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 10:05:42 EDT
[asa] Creation "waters"
George Cooper
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 10:01:22 EDT
[asa] Faraday Resource for Churches
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 09:27:12 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
George Murphy
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 04:53:08 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Don Winterstein
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 04:44:23 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Don Winterstein
Wed Sep 17 2008 - 03:32:30 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Iain Strachan
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 23:46:14 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Merv
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 21:17:32 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Jon Tandy
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 20:47:38 EDT
Re: [asa] Letter, Richard Dawkins on the Royal Society row
George Murphy
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 19:57:26 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Randy Isaac
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 18:05:59 EDT
[asa] Letter, Richard Dawkins on the Royal Society row
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 17:07:06 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 17:01:00 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 16:13:48 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Kirk Bertsche
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 15:19:29 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Rich Blinne
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 15:02:32 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
George Murphy
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 14:02:29 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Randy Isaac
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 11:52:47 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
j burg
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 11:41:58 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 11:41:08 EDT
[asa] H Allen Orr
Chris Barden
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 02:07:59 EDT
Re: [asa] British creation museum
Michael Roberts
Tue Sep 16 2008 - 03:01:34 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Don Winterstein
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 19:38:48 EDT
Re: [asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb
Merv
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 18:09:45 EDT
[asa] British creation museum
Dehler, Bernie
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 17:40:06 EDT
Re: [asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb
Murray Hogg
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 14:04:33 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 12:52:34 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Dehler, Bernie
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 12:46:42 EDT
RE: [asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb
Dehler, Bernie
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 11:56:09 EDT
Re: [asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb
David Campbell
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 10:43:53 EDT
[asa] RE: asa-digest V1 #9143
Austerberry, Charles
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 10:01:28 EDT
Re: [asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb
David Opderbeck
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 09:00:53 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Alexanian, Moorad
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 08:35:30 EDT
Re: [asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb
Merv
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 08:02:56 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: Swiss proton frenzy (or, are you ready to meet God?)
Iain Strachan
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 07:52:19 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: Swiss proton frenzy (or, are you ready to meet God?)
Chris Barden
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 04:50:32 EDT
[asa] Re: Swiss proton frenzy (or, are you ready to meet God?)
Murray Hogg
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 04:25:54 EDT
Re: [asa] Swiss proton frenzy (or, are you ready to meet God?)
Iain Strachan
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 04:57:36 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Don Winterstein
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 04:45:37 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Don Winterstein
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 01:21:25 EDT
Re: [asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb
Murray Hogg
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 01:14:01 EDT
[asa] Swiss proton frenzy (or, are you ready to meet God?)
Murray Hogg
Mon Sep 15 2008 - 01:03:36 EDT
Re: [asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb
Bethany Sollereder
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 23:44:28 EDT
Re: [asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb
Merv
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 22:27:23 EDT
[asa] Isaiah 11:6: Wolf and Lamb
David Opderbeck
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 19:52:37 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
William Hamilton
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 18:32:55 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
james000777@bellsouth.net
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 15:40:03 EDT
[asa] Providence and ID
Dave Wallace
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 15:00:09 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Alexanian, Moorad
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 14:39:46 EDT
RE: [asa] Providence? (and reductive or elevated Science?)
Alexanian, Moorad
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 12:39:18 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
David Clounch
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 12:10:57 EDT
RE: [asa] Providence? (and reductive or elevated Science?)
Gregory Arago
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 11:24:38 EDT
[asa] The Social Psychology of the Origins Debate
Steve Martin
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 08:56:34 EDT
RE: [asa] Providence?
Alexanian, Moorad
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 08:39:26 EDT
RE: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Alexanian, Moorad
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 02:45:58 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Don Winterstein
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 00:40:08 EDT
Re: [asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
David Clounch
Sun Sep 14 2008 - 00:20:14 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
David Clounch
Sat Sep 13 2008 - 19:58:47 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
Gregory Arago
Sat Sep 13 2008 - 14:41:04 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
George Murphy
Sat Sep 13 2008 - 13:34:31 EDT
RE: [asa] Interesting web site
Dick Fischer
Sat Sep 13 2008 - 08:19:02 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
Gregory Arago
Sat Sep 13 2008 - 06:28:08 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
Dave Wallace
Fri Sep 12 2008 - 16:52:05 EDT
[asa] LHC
Randy Isaac
Fri Sep 12 2008 - 12:44:41 EDT
Re: [asa] Re: The Hockey Stick Holds Up
David Campbell
Fri Sep 12 2008 - 11:52:24 EDT
RE: [asa] Interesting web site
gordon brown
Fri Sep 12 2008 - 10:14:58 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
Jack Haas
Fri Sep 12 2008 - 09:37:06 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
j burg
Fri Sep 12 2008 - 09:23:07 EDT
RE: [asa] Interesting web site
Dick Fischer
Fri Sep 12 2008 - 07:11:59 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
Merv
Fri Sep 12 2008 - 07:36:23 EDT
RE: [asa] Forums?
James Patterson
Fri Sep 12 2008 - 00:35:55 EDT
RE: [asa] Forums?
skrogh.
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 22:35:31 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
Merv
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 22:15:27 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
RC Metcalf
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 18:23:36 EDT
Fw: [asa] Francis Beckwith on Dembski and Baylor
Michael Roberts
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 17:46:49 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 17:48:00 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
George Murphy
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 17:32:17 EDT
Re: [asa] serious talk about ID and TE
Lynn Walker
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 17:19:02 EDT
Re: [asa] ? about peer review
Lynn Walker
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 17:08:44 EDT
RE: [asa] Forums?
George Cooper
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 16:53:30 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 16:51:44 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
Don Nield
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 15:46:22 EDT
Re: [asa] Francis Beckwith on Dembski and Baylor
Michael Roberts
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 16:46:21 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
George Murphy
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 16:42:22 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
Murray Hogg
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 16:35:20 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 16:31:47 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 16:20:56 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
Murray Hogg
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 16:14:38 EDT
RE: [asa] Providence?
Jon Tandy
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 16:10:04 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 16:06:27 EDT
RE: [asa] Providence?
Alexanian, Moorad
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 14:55:21 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
j burg
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 14:30:59 EDT
Re: [asa] serious talk about ID and TE
j burg
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 14:23:26 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 14:12:30 EDT
Re: [asa] Dialup survey
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 14:06:38 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 14:20:51 EDT
[asa] Re: The Hockey Stick Holds Up
j burg
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 13:59:27 EDT
Re: [asa] serious talk about ID and TE
Ted Davis
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 13:31:53 EDT
Re: [asa] serious talk about ID and TE
David Campbell
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 12:23:19 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
David Campbell
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 12:41:35 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 10:06:48 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
j burg
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 10:22:37 EDT
RE: [asa] Dialup survey
skrogh.
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 10:12:21 EDT
Re: [asa] Dialup survey
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 10:09:20 EDT
[asa] Dialup survey
j burg
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 10:08:00 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 10:05:22 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
David Heddle
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 10:02:18 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 09:55:51 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
j burg
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 08:04:14 EDT
RE: [asa] The Big Sleep
Jon Tandy
Thu Sep 11 2008 - 03:58:44 EDT
Re: [asa] The Big Sleep
Murray Hogg
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 22:40:39 EDT
Re: [asa] Providence?
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 22:35:52 EDT
[asa] Providence?
George Murphy
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 22:27:26 EDT
Re: [asa] Forums?
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 22:04:58 EDT
[asa] Providence?
James Patterson
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 21:39:26 EDT
[asa] Forums?
James Patterson
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 21:33:33 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
James Patterson
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 21:32:47 EDT
RE: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
James Patterson
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 21:06:34 EDT
RE: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
Ted Davis
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 19:55:06 EDT
Re: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 19:31:35 EDT
Re: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
Steve Matheson
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 19:17:56 EDT
RE: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
Dick Fischer
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 19:01:55 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dick Fischer
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 18:48:31 EDT
Re: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
John Walley
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 17:53:57 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 17:53:16 EDT
Re: [asa] RE: Demonic possession
David Campbell
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 16:55:09 EDT
[asa] Re: The Hockey Stick Holds Up
Rich Blinne
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 16:42:12 EDT
Re: [asa] The Big Sleep
Vernon Jenkins
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 15:49:08 EDT
[asa] Re: The Hockey Stick Holds Up
j burg
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 15:38:34 EDT
[asa] Re: The Hockey Stick Holds Up
Rich Blinne
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 14:06:52 EDT
[asa] Re: The Hockey Stick Holds Up
j burg
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:47:39 EDT
[asa] LHC, TOE, and the limits of knowledge
Iain Strachan
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:45:08 EDT
[asa] The Hockey Stick Holds Up
Rich Blinne
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:32:46 EDT
[asa] Resource on Religion Clauses
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:30:16 EDT
[asa] Re: Francis Beckwith on Dembski and Baylor
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:23:22 EDT
[asa] Francis Beckwith on Dembski and Baylor
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:17:21 EDT
Re: [asa] If you can read this...
Michael Roberts
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:11:34 EDT
Re: [asa] If you can read this...
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:08:07 EDT
[asa] If you can read this...
Steve Matheson
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 10:43:12 EDT
Re: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
j burg
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 10:42:24 EDT
Re: [asa] Interesting web site
Rich Blinne
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 10:32:57 EDT
[asa] Physics for Future Presidents
j burg
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 09:38:38 EDT
RE: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
Ted Davis
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 06:14:54 EDT
[asa] Interesting web site
Jack Syme
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 04:37:20 EDT
Re: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
Michael Roberts
Wed Sep 10 2008 - 01:17:16 EDT
RE: [asa] The end is near? LHC
Jon Tandy
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 22:58:45 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 22:35:00 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 22:11:50 EDT
RE: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
George Murphy
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 21:06:30 EDT
RE: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
John Walley
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 20:39:15 EDT
RE: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
James Patterson
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 20:19:33 EDT
RE: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
Dick Fischer
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 20:06:39 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dick Fischer
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 18:46:14 EDT
Re: [asa] RE: Demonic possession
Murray Hogg
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 18:16:20 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
gordon brown
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 17:40:34 EDT
[asa] RE: Demonic possession
Jon Tandy
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 17:09:35 EDT
Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC
Michael Roberts
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 17:06:28 EDT
Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC
j burg
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 16:43:43 EDT
Re: Demonic possession (was Re: [asa] The Big Sleep)
David Opderbeck
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 16:37:12 EDT
Demonic possession (was Re: [asa] The Big Sleep)
Murray Hogg
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 16:22:16 EDT
RE: [asa] The end is near? LHC
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 16:09:42 EDT
Re: [asa] New page
George Murphy
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 15:46:03 EDT
Re: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
George Murphy
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 13:43:05 EDT
Re: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
james000777@bellsouth.net
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 13:29:57 EDT
Re: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
Michael Roberts
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 13:07:26 EDT
RE: [asa] The Big Sleep
Donald F Calbreath
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 12:49:50 EDT
Re: [asa] Greetings - An introduction
Dennis Venema
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 10:04:21 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 12:31:36 EDT
[asa] Greetings - An introduction
james000777@bellsouth.net
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 10:36:09 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dick Fischer
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 10:58:08 EDT
Re: [asa] New page
james000777@bellsouth.net
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 10:50:25 EDT
Re: [asa] The Big Sleep
james000777@bellsouth.net
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 10:46:56 EDT
Re: [asa] The Big Sleep
james000777@bellsouth.net
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 10:41:07 EDT
Re: [asa] The Big Sleep
james000777@bellsouth.net
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 12:12:33 EDT
Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC
Michael Roberts
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 09:57:54 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 10:28:52 EDT
[asa] Greetings - An introduction
james000777@bellsouth.net
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 09:43:03 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 09:32:14 EDT
Re: [asa] "On the asa list no one can hear you scream - or can they?"
j burg
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 09:31:03 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 06:09:42 EDT
Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC
Jack Syme
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 04:54:58 EDT
Re: [asa] The Big Sleep
Iain Strachan
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 02:39:33 EDT
RE: [asa] The end is near? LHC
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 02:09:39 EDT
Re: [asa] The Big Sleep
Michael Roberts
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 01:49:28 EDT
Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC
Don Winterstein
Tue Sep 09 2008 - 00:52:27 EDT
Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC
Don Winterstein
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 23:30:04 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
gordon brown
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 22:53:23 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dick Fischer
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 22:18:34 EDT
Re: [asa] New page
gordon brown
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 20:00:45 EDT
Re: [asa] The Big Sleep
Murray Hogg
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 19:10:19 EDT
Re: [asa] "On the asa list no one can hear you scream - or can they?"
George Murphy
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 19:03:45 EDT
[asa] New page
Vernon Jenkins
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 18:56:56 EDT
[asa] The Big Sleep
Vernon Jenkins
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 17:11:53 EDT
Re: [asa] The end is near? LHC
Iain Strachan
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 17:00:31 EDT
Re: [asa] "On the asa list no one can hear you scream - or can they?"
Iain Strachan
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 16:56:41 EDT
[asa] "On the asa list no one can hear you scream - or can they?"
George Murphy
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 15:56:23 EDT
[asa] The end is near? LHC
Dehler, Bernie
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 14:54:33 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 14:51:31 EDT
RE: [asa] Another Reason Design Arguments are Important
George Cooper
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 14:03:59 EDT
Re: [asa] Another Reason Design Arguments are Important
Iain Strachan
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 12:43:22 EDT
Re: [asa] Darwin Miracle
j burg
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 12:41:27 EDT
Re: [asa] Darwin Miracle
j burg
Mon Sep 08 2008 - 12:31:11 EDT
[asa] Another Reason Design Arguments are Important
David Opderbeck
Sat Sep 06 2008 - 23:29:24 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Sat Sep 06 2008 - 19:51:11 EDT
[asa] Darwin Miracle
David Opderbeck
Sat Sep 06 2008 - 16:24:49 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Sat Sep 06 2008 - 15:38:41 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dick Fischer
Sat Sep 06 2008 - 13:56:43 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Sat Sep 06 2008 - 13:30:22 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 18:50:35 EDT
Re: [asa] Global Warming and creationism in the news
Rich Blinne
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 16:46:55 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Campbell
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 16:41:34 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 15:32:03 EDT
Re: [asa] Global Warming and creationism in the news
j burg
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 15:16:45 EDT
Re: [asa] Global Warming and creationism in the news
j burg
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 14:35:53 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 14:31:48 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 13:12:59 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 12:36:23 EDT
[asa] Record Ice Loss in August
Rich Blinne
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 12:22:25 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
gordon brown
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:49:58 EDT
Re: [asa] Global Warming and creationism in the news
Rich Blinne
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:46:05 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:39:33 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dick Fischer
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:35:06 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Michael Roberts
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:26:44 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 11:01:54 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 10:53:55 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 10:48:06 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 09:40:09 EDT
[asa] Global Warming and creationism in the news
j burg
Fri Sep 05 2008 - 00:46:13 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
gordon brown
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 22:37:18 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 20:10:32 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 19:48:08 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Merv
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 18:58:26 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 18:22:04 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Merv
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 17:47:02 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 16:40:35 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 15:42:15 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 15:37:37 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 14:15:42 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 13:59:17 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 13:32:00 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 13:10:03 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 12:06:35 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 12:00:10 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 11:50:14 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam-logically inconsistent?
Michael Roberts
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 11:35:37 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
kbmill@ksu.edu
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 11:29:24 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dick Fischer
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 11:18:48 EDT
[asa] News from Dawkins
Dehler, Bernie
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 10:49:26 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 10:29:50 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 09:50:41 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 08:26:10 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Randy Isaac
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 08:20:37 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Merv
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 08:09:00 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Loren Haarsma
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 07:58:24 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Ted Davis
Thu Sep 04 2008 - 02:21:13 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Michael Roberts
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 23:59:25 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 19:01:09 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 18:52:13 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Merv
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 18:00:54 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 17:47:03 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 17:33:10 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Keith Miller
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 17:22:52 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 16:56:49 EDT
FW: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 16:54:02 EDT
Re: [asa] Looking for a post
Ted Davis
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 15:12:02 EDT
[asa] ASA members invited to attend events sponsored by Central PA Forum for Religion and Science
Ted Davis
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 12:05:41 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 11:59:38 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 11:52:14 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Randy Isaac
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 11:46:16 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 11:35:35 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 11:20:07 EDT
[asa] John Cleese on science, religion & genetic determinism
Loren Haarsma
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 10:43:49 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 08:28:35 EDT
RE: [asa] Rebuttals?
IW
Wed Sep 03 2008 - 00:08:11 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 23:00:55 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 19:56:44 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 19:50:32 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 18:48:19 EDT
Re: [asa] Rebuttals?
David Campbell
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 18:35:31 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dick Fischer
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 18:28:03 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Campbell
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 18:03:51 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 17:58:23 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Don Nield
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 17:16:26 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 17:01:29 EDT
Re: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 16:42:10 EDT
RE: [asa] (amoeba) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 16:38:59 EDT
RE: [asa] (fall) biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 15:09:22 EDT
[asa] Looking for a post
skrogh.
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 14:16:03 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 13:49:45 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 13:28:10 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 12:26:02 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dave Wallace
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 11:52:57 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dick Fischer
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 10:51:30 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 10:51:10 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 10:25:39 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
George Cooper
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 10:19:04 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 07:55:43 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Alexanian, Moorad
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 06:27:59 EDT
[asa] Discussion on Christology and Science
Steve Martin
Tue Sep 02 2008 - 01:09:14 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 21:50:12 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dick Fischer
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 21:21:21 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 20:31:04 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Bethany Sollereder
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 17:13:22 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Don Nield
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 15:43:48 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 15:28:55 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Roger G. Olson
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 15:36:58 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Merv
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 14:55:09 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 14:50:14 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Campbell
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 14:49:17 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 14:37:50 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 14:37:57 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 14:28:35 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 14:25:55 EDT
RE: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Dehler, Bernie
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 12:50:45 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
Merv
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:21:21 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:06:34 EDT
Re: [asa] biological evolution and a literal Adam- logically inconsistent?
David Opderbeck
Last message date
:
Tue Sep 30 2008 - 22:36:11 EDT
Archived on
: Tue Sep 30 2008 - 22:36:12 EDT
550 messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [
subject
] [
attachment
]
Nearby
: [
Other mail archives
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.1.8
: Tue Sep 30 2008 - 22:36:12 EDT