Bernie,
you obviously haven't read Alan Hill's paper, which proves that the water would stay in Mesopotamia as long as the Bible says it did.??I personally believe the flood was probably smaller in scope that Alan believes.? But nonetheless he did prove with valid hydrology modeling that a Flood of the larger scope could have stayed in the Mesopotamian basin for as long as the Bible says it did.? If you "don't think" it could be so, then you are claiming to have intuition that is more valid then the actual hydrology equations.? I gave the link to his paper yesterday -- here it is again:
http://www.asa3.org/aSA/PSCF/2006/PSCF6-06Hill.pdf
Let nobody _ever_again_ say that it's not possible for the water to stay in Mesopotamia as long as the Bible said it did.? Anybody who wants to say so had better come forward with math models that are better than Alan's.
I want to add this, too:? Alan did not take into account that the wind blowing the ark inland would also have kept the water in-place.? Wind would provide a shear stress in the uphill direction, and because water is quite viscious, and the flood plain quite shallow over most of its extend during the flood, it would be very easy for the water to stay indefinitely as long as the modest wind kept blowing.
Also, you need to add the effect of waves, which Alan further neglected.? Because waves in shallow waters are asymmetric in the upper versus lower branches, they produce net transport of water.? Wind that blows over long stretches of open water cannot help but create significant waves, and these would add to the water transported uphill through the Mesopotamian basin.
Alan neglected these two features in his math analysis, and so therefore he was being more conservative than was necessary.? It is actually much easier for the water to stay in Mesopotamia for as long as the Bible says.? And even though he negelected these things, he still proved that it was easily possible via his valid mathematical solution of the hydrology equations.
Let nobody ever again dispute this without math equations.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Dehler, Bernie <bernie.dehler@intel.com>
To: asa@calvin.edu
Sent: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:58 pm
Subject: RE: [asa] Noah's local flood?
" I really have no idea what geological evidence would be expected given
a
full range of scenarios incorporating "dunking" with rain augmentation."
I think that one of the biggest problems is that for a massive flood
(one that kills all life around it), you need a geographical bowl shape
to contain the water- or else all the water will follow the river and
drain into the ocean. I don't think there's any bowl. And I don't
think the water can come down faster than it can leave via the rivers,
let alone stick around for a significant time. Sure, floods happen all
the time, but a flood of "Biblical proportions?"
...Bernie
-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On
Behalf Of George Cooper
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:16 AM
To: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: RE: [asa] Noah's local flood?
That doesn't surprise me. Yet, as much as I like natural processes to
work
within God's plan, the Flood certainly could be an intervention event
since
judgment was upon them. This is not unlike Sodom and Gomorah (but not
like
hurricane Katrina since Bourbon Street was, essentially, missed).
I really have no idea what geological evidence would be expected given a
full range of scenarios incorporating "dunking" with rain augmentation.
Coope
-----Original Message-----
From: j burg [mailto:hossradbourne@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:35 AM
To: George Cooper
Cc: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: [asa] Noah's local flood?
On 6/27/08, George Cooper <georgecooper@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Is there any conjecture as to the possibility of the Arabian Plate
dipping
> in its NW region by, say, 0.08 deg.?This would drop that area by 2
miles.
> That dunk would only be 0.05% of its total height from Earth's center.
> Or, perhaps, the Eurasian plate rose slightly as the Arabian plate
dropped.
> I have no idea about such matters, admittedly, but am curious if this
has
> been discussed. [My apologies if I've missed it in these
discussions.]
>
> I had some discussion with Glenn Morton on this recently. He has what
looks like a convincing argument that such a dip is beyond the pale. I'm
not
expert to ay, however, if his argument is airtight.
> Burgy
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jun 27 18:28:29 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 27 2008 - 18:28:30 EDT