That wasn't nice.
My goal is simply to understand the approaches being taken in the real world,
apart from what theorists might say is the "right" approach.
If you have a *better* way to phrase the question, I'm all for it. Teach me.
But please don't insult me.
At 11:16 AM 5/29/2008, you wrote:
>[applause] Post of the month! Maybe the year! :-D
>
>And seriously, don't bother visiting the "POLL" on the site. It's
>incomprehensible.
>
> >>> "David Opderbeck" <dopderbeck@gmail.com> 05/29/08 11:09 AM >>>
>Sounds like parenting, or cooking, or sex.
>
>On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Rich Blinne <rich.blinne@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > A cute "definition" is currently going around the Internet:
> >
> > Science: If you don't make mistakes you are doing it wrong. If you don't
> > correct those mistakes you are really doing it wrong. If you don't accept
> > you're mistaken then you are not doing it at all.
> >
> > Rich Blinne
> > Member ASA
> >
>
>
>
>--
>David W. Opderbeck
>Associate Professor of Law
>Seton Hall University Law School
>Gibbons Institute of Law, Science & Technology
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
>"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://www.brendemuehl.net
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu May 29 13:32:05 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 29 2008 - 13:32:05 EDT