A smile and a sigh, indeed! Ironic then that the term 'total creationist' wasn't used instead of 'total evolutionist.' Might want to check out how many ASAers out there live with a theology of paradox and mystery, apophatically, instead of kataphatically, with rationalism and empirical proofs as the primary basis for their (westernized) faith. Perhaps only in such a label-sensitive, politically-correct world does one shun the term 'creationist' (after noting: 'we are all creationists!') to embrace an alternative, seemingly antagonistic (i.e. evolutionist, according to 20th century debate), even self-contradictory view that is meant mainly to accommodate science with religion so as not to be afflicted by a 'warfare model,' which is inescapably fundamental to evolution's 'struggle,' competition, conflict motif anyway! I agree in the spirit of your compromise.
"skrogh." <panterragroup@mindspring.com> wrote:
TE and EC are creationists, as well.
---------------------------------
Instant message from any web browser! Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger for the Web BETA
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed May 28 16:30:46 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 28 2008 - 16:30:46 EDT