On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Don Winterstein <dfwinterstein@msn.com>
wrote:
> A point that will stick out glaringly to many is, "The January global
> land surface average was below the 20th century mean...." How seriously is
> the man in the street going to take GW if you have a month whose average
> temperature is below the average for the entire last century?
>
>
That's simply not true. That's my point. This whole new global cooling phase
is a lie. But don't take my word for it. Note what Jim Hansen said on
another list:
If you like to see how unusual the global temperature in January was go to
> http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/
> and click on the channel LT data (global lower troposphere, about 900 mb
> level). You can see that the temperature was actually above the 20 year
> mean, and today the temperature is back up to the level of last year, far
> above the 20-year mean. Note that this is the web site of John Christy, a
> contrarian. He has been very quiet about the fact that the satellite data
> now show that the position he was taking for years is way off base. Jim
I went out there and you can see the results here:
http://picasaweb.google.com/rich.blinne/GlobalWarming/photo#5172507451008704290
Rich Blinne, Member ASA
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Feb 29 16:05:47 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 29 2008 - 16:05:48 EST