Re: [asa] The Hebrew for the Making of Man

> I'd be very interested to hear anyone's responses as to the grammatical
> question.

The thread has gotten away from this. I'd also be interested in any
comments on the grammatical claims relating to the creation of Adam
(2:7).

What I do know from examination of concordances, footnotes, etc. with
rather limited knowledge of Hebrew is
a) claiming that a particular word must always/never mean something is
probably a bit suspect-there's often a good deal of flexibility
b) figurative and literal usage is not determined by vocabulary;
rather it is the style, the context, and comparison with known
physical reality which enables us to detect literal or figurative
statements
c) reading particular scientific concepts into the text is probably
wrong. In particular, the argument about Adam becoming a living being
hinges on a precise interpretation of the sequence and nature of the
events described in making Adam in Genesis 2, which seems a bit
circular.

-- 
Dr. David Campbell
425 Scientific Collections
University of Alabama
"I think of my happy condition, surrounded by acres of clams"
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.