Re: [asa] Evolution in the Bible

Mike,

  I'm saying the Big Bang is finite (like a big black hole that somehow reversed itself and went supernova equivalent) and that the visible universe is tiny pocket in that burst (imagine the Sun blew up and the fireball reached out to Pluto but you were living on a mote of dust back near the orbit of Mercury and could only see a few meters in any direction) and that if you go far enough away you won't see any of the Big Bang any more but very probably will eventually find other cosmic scale black holes that are not blowing up and maybe a few that are in one stage or another of blowing up. Something like that is what I imagine to be somewhat likely.even though I've got a few other real corker concepts for a multiple concentric nested event horizon black hole structure in which normal space/time is only extant in one of these many layers between event horizons. (Seriously, don't get me started. Seriously.)

  Have you presented these in an ATM forum? I would recommend www.bautforum.com. They have a very active Against the Mainstream forum.

  Earthly history is precisely where science and the Bible converge in the least ambiguous way. That's totally fair game and really a place where the Bible could get some serious objective traction.
  Yes, but as a document of truth, it should stand tall. This is a must for any testable, objective claim.

  *snip*

  My only departure from all BBT theory is that it is ultimately finite in extent and that there are most probably other examples of BBs scattered about at that scale. Being a finite starting point like a cosmic scale black hole that went boom obviates the need for inflation because there is no infinite density starting point. You can start the whole thing off at post inflation densities and it will work the same. Being finite also allows the cosmological principal to only have to be regionally pervasive.

  As I understand BBT, though very limited, it does not require a specific moment in time for its begining. It does not start with t=0, perhaps t=10^-43, or, perhaps, a nanohair thereafter. Infinite density is not a requirement, either, right? Some versions of BBT might, admittedly.

  -Mike (Friend of ASA and Bayesian Nut Job.)

  A Bayesian Nut Job. :) That might explain why you're willing to talk to the world's only self-acclaimed heliochromologist!

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Dec 6 10:59:14 2007