Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")

 That works for me.? -Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: philtill@aol.com
To: mlucid@aol.com; asa@calvin.edu
Sent: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:27 am
Subject: Re: "Hidden" Theological Issues with Theistic Evolution (was Re: [asa] E.O. Wilson "Baptist No More")

You say nature is incomplete just like the reductionist program (the system) that models it.? I don't agree that nature is incomplete.?
No, I didn't say that.? I was using a reductio ad absurdum argument.? It's absurd from a reductionist point of view to think that nature is incomplete, and therefore the contrary position is established.

?

________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=aolcmp00050000000003

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Dec 3 23:42:21 2007