You say nature is incomplete just like the reductionist program (the system) that models it.? I don't agree that nature is incomplete.?
No, I didn't say that.? I was using a reductio ad absurdum argument.? It's absurd from a reductionist point of view to think that nature is incomplete, and therefore the contrary position is established.
________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=aolcmp00050000000003
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Dec 3 11:31:40 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 03 2007 - 11:31:40 EST