If my memory is correct, Ian Plimer in his book "Telling lies for God"
documented the dichotomy between Snelling's early work on legitimate
geology using standard dating and his later writings on YEC creation
science.
Don
David Campbell wrote:
>> "Respected creation scientists" - there's an oxymoron for you!
>
>> > > > one of the world's most respected creation scientists <<<<
>
> It doesn't actually say that he's respected, just that he's more
> respected than most creation scientists.
>
> I think Snelling has actually done some legitmate geology work, though
> as this indicates that he knows better than what he teaches, it's
> doubtful whether this earns more respect than someone whose work shows
> no sign of knowing better.
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Jun 21 19:18:19 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 21 2007 - 19:18:20 EDT