On 3/31/07, James Mahaffy <Mahaffy@dordt.edu> wrote:
>
>
> st
> > religion of any kind, or your anti-ID glasses are so thick that you
> can only
> > see through that lense, or something else.
>
>
> I must say though that the automatic slams against ID and any
> Creationists not TE have been less. Not yet to the point that they would
> feel welcome as brothers with whom most of disagree but I think we used
> to be worse. Could we even get to the point of dialog?
Not the slightest chance when every few days we get the repeated mantra of
"Scientifically Vacuous" rammed down our throats. There is one thing I know
well, and that is that Pim thinks ID is scientifically vacuous, because he
must have told us so about 150 times!
It's about time both sides started listening to each other instead of making
insulting statements.
In the "Time" debate that was posted in another thread, Collins gently
chided Dawkins for describing creationists as "clowns" and pointed out that
he wasn't doing his cause any good by using language like that. We should
also take heed.
Iain
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Mar 31 13:13:43 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 31 2007 - 13:13:45 EDT