Far from silly, it is entirely relevant for those who consider ideology, science and religion/theology. I meant to challenge Glenn's use of 'accommodation' as well Jack, not just yours. Glenn seems to be taunting the ideology of accommodationism as opposed to merely sometimes accommodating when necessary. The question of who asked the question of 'how far' is legitimate - hopefully Glenn will answer, including the field(s) of study of the questioner.
g.a.
Jack <drsyme@cablespeed.com> wrote:
That seems to be a silly question, Glenn used this phrase, I just rephrased it: "how far accommodation..."
----- Original Message -----
From: Gregory Arago
To: Jack ; Glenn Morton ; asa@calvin.edu
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: [asa] Question for all the theistic evolutionists
Linguistic correction:
"Who asked the question about how far accomodation-ism is willing to go?"
It seems to be the ideology of accomodationism and not just the accomodating itself that Jack is questioning here and that Glenn is taunting.
g.a.
Jack <drsyme@cablespeed.com> wrote:
Why does an ahistoric passage have to be verifiable for it to be meaningful?
But all of the scriptures point to truth of the risen Christ. That is what you have to hang your hat on. If that is proven incorrect, then everything else is meaningless.
Who asked the question about how far accomodation is willing to go? Was that on this list or somewhere else? I am honestly interested in that answer.
---------------------------------
All new Yahoo! Mail
---------------------------------
Get news delivered. Enjoy RSS feeds right on your Mail page.
---------------------------------
All new Yahoo! Mail
---------------------------------
Get news delivered. Enjoy RSS feeds right on your Mail page.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Mar 18 20:54:09 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 18 2007 - 20:54:09 EDT