On 2/5/07, Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> At 11:50 PM 2/4/2007, Rich Blinne wrote:
>
>
> "Since I have been quoted over and over and over, let's reset the context.
> This was a reaction to a Daily Telegraph story of the leaked AR4. Now I know
> that the prediction was based upon different scenarios of CO2 emissions. So,
> my point above is not valid since I was unaware that the predictions were
> scenario-based. Therefore, I publicly retract my comment.
>
>
> *@@ *My translation: "I'm getting my head on straight and getting with
> the program if I know what's good for my career." :)
>
My views on global warming have nothing to do with my career which is
semiconductor design. Nice try.
My translation: "I'm getting my head on straight and getting with the
program because that is where the evidence leads me."
It is precisely this kind of false accusation that causes some scientists to
dismiss out of hand not only legitimate criticism of climate change but also
Christianity. The latter is why I make a big deal about this on this list
because I could care less which sides wins in the climate change debate as
long as the truth come out.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Feb 5 12:18:15 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 05 2007 - 12:18:15 EST