Re: [asa] Limted role for CO2

If you insist on being skeptical about one side only, you will surely
find some people who will support you in your quest. However, if you
are interested in the truth, you need to do the hard work yourself,
read the relevant papers, research the claims made.

But sometimes it is easier to be in denial, which luckily is also the
first step towards recovery.
So if Janice is interested, she can identify three statements made by
the person and then decide to find supporting or disproving evidence.
For instance the uncertainty of the human contribution. Could we have
been contributing to cooling?

Remember: CO2 is a greenhouse gas, CO2 has almost doubled in the
atmosphere, most of this comes from human activities. The basic
foundations are very simple. So explain how human additions to
greenhouse gasses can contribute to global cooling.

Of course, one can always remain comfortably numb as the song goes.

On 2/5/07, Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Another "cooler head" chimes in.

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Feb 5 12:09:14 2007