Re: [asa] Roles of women

From: Charles Carrigan <CCarriga@olivet.edu>
Date: Wed Jan 31 2007 - 13:30:41 EST

Quite a different story from what has been happening on our campus this past week. Dr. Mary Paul (ONU Prof. in School of Theology & Christian Ministry) has been the featured guest speaker in the morning Chapel & evening Church services during our Winter revival meetings.
 
 
Best,
Charles
 
 
_______________________________
Charles W. Carrigan, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Geology
Olivet Nazarene Univ., Dept. of Physical Sciences
One University Ave.
Bourbonnais, IL 60914
PH: (815) 939-5346
FX: (815) 939-5071
ccarriga@olivet.edu
http://geology.olivet.edu/
 
"To a naturalist nothing is indifferent;
the humble moss that creeps upon the stone
is equally interesting as the lofty pine which so beautifully adorns the valley or the mountain:
but to a naturalist who is reading in the face of the rocks the annals of a former world,
the mossy covering which obstructs his view,
and renders indistinguishable the different species of stone,
is no less than a serious subject of regret."
          - James Hutton
_______________________________

>>> "Austerberry, Charles" <cfauster@creighton.edu> 1/30/2007 5:52 PM >>>

Reasons (poor ones, generally) for restricting what women can do in the church range from hermeneutical to scientific. What strikes me is how scripture can become an idol, which can then lead to unfounded doctrines that are ungodly, in my opinion. Whether God chose to put inerrant history and science in the Bible should be a question resolved through open study, not a litmus-test doctrine. Likewise, whether St. Paul's attitude about women in roles of authority more reflects God's perspective or Paul's human cultural perspective ought to be an open question, not policy, in my opinion. This action of the SBC makes me sad, but it's consistent with many conservative denominations' actions towards biology professors who would teach evolution. At least women can teach biology (if not evolution) in SBC schools. But what if the SBC decides that pastors-to-be should learn some biology (imagine!) in SBC seminaries? Could women teach them biology, even though they can't teach Hebrew? Which has more significance for theology anyway? http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/religion/stories/012007dnmetnubaptists.176f48d.html
 
Chuck Austerberry
e-mail: cfauster@creighton.edu
Nebraska Religious Coalition for Science Education
http://nrcse.creighton.edu
 
 
 

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Jan 31 13:31:16 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 13:31:24 EST