Note that 1. the issue was not about censorship 2. the issue was not
about religion per se.
Perhaps if you can quote from Dawkins then we can see what Dawkins et
al are driving at.
On 1/27/07, Dawsonzhu@aol.com <Dawsonzhu@aol.com> wrote:
> PvM wrote
>
> When atheists start a movement which insists that science can show the
> absence of a designer, it is time to object similarly to such an abuse
> of science.
>
>
> Isn't that exactly what Dawkins et al. are driving at?
>
> Other than some rare gems that Jack Haas digs up, who in
> the academic community is really challenging any of these
> examples of science held captive? Moreover, even these
> examples Jack has found are individuals. They don't write
> petitions to gang up on Dawkins, they simply comment that
> they don't agree with him and why they don't agree.
>
> I'm not saying I agree with ID, but I think if Dawkins
> has the full freedom to preach his brand of religion (as
> an individual) without censor, then most certainly so
> does Gonzalez (as an individual).
>
> by Grace we proceed,
> Wayne
>
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sat Jan 27 09:24:35 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 27 2007 - 09:24:35 EST