> @@ You cherry-pick and quote the arrogant "scientists" who attempt to BS
> the uninitiated into swallowing the lie that "consensus" = "science", and I'll
> cherry-pick the intellectually honest, humble ones, to quote:
>
When was arrogance the valid measure of truth? A truth teller can be
very obnoxious, and their words difficult to take, but that is why we
Christians most learn to listen _for_ the truth.
What is important is the truth, and I'm still waiting on that from you
on this subject.
> "My lifetime study of Earth's climate system has humbled me. I'm convinced
> that we have greatly underestimated the complexity of this system. The
> importance of obscure phenomena, ranging from those that control the size of
> raindrops to those that control the amount of water pouring into the deep sea from
> the shelves of the Antarctic continent, makes reliable modeling very
> difficult, if not impossible. "
>
I don't read "give up". I read that he is trying his best
to take in all the variables, like a good scientist would
want to do to be sure he/she has considered all the
variables in a problem. A good scientist is
typically aware of the difficulties of his/her problem and
admits those difficulties up front. I sense you manipulating
his honesty here.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Sun Jan 21 05:59:10 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 21 2007 - 05:59:10 EST