Re: [asa] moon dust

So it is quite plausible then - by YEC standards.!

Shall we write it up and send it to CRSQ?

Cant people see just how absurd YEC is?

Michael

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Campbell" <pleuronaia@gmail.com>
To: <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 11:21 PM
Subject: Re: [asa] moon dust

>> I must confess now. I simply made it all up and the journal as well.
>
> It's not that different from the authentic young-earth model of
> impact-caused tsunamis constituting the Flood. As global flood models
> go, it doesn't violate the laws of thermodynamics quite as badly as
> several others-Noah would not be quite as thoroughly carbonized as in
> most.
>
> As far as I can tell, the usual young-earth claim is that there is a
> thin dust layer on top of solid rock on the moon. That claim is
> untrue. There's some degree of cementation of particles in the
> regolith, in addition to the presence of larger particles below the
> thin layer of loose dust. The cementation is a factor overlooked in
> some of the more extreme pre-landing estimates of dust thickness.
>
> --
> Dr. David Campbell
> 425 Scientific Collections
> University of Alabama
> "I think of my happy condition, surrounded by acres of clams"
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Wed Jan 17 06:42:48 2007