And comprehend
From the massive quote below
<quote>At this point, I'm far from arguing that anyone has established
a connection between solar irradiance changes and temperature changes.
However, it is incorrect to say that no statistical correlations
between solar irradiance changes and temperature changes (in this
case, to tropical SST in particular) have been observed. Whether those
correlations are valid is a different issue.
</quote>
Even if we accept a statistical correlation, and the data are
certainly not clear, the effect of such correlation need to be shown.
As data have shown, the solar contributions are much smaller than the
anthropogenic component.
Hope this helps understand further this issue as I can understand that
the technical details may be too much for anyone to fully comprehend.
And why is Janice reverting to 'older science' suddenly?
Is there an argument she wishes to make or is she just interested in
learning from her mistakes? Either way I am fully willing to comply.
On 1/16/07, Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> wrote:
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:59:33 -0800
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 16 2007 - 19:00:00 EST