Re: [asa] moon dust

From: Michael Roberts <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
Date: Mon Jan 15 2007 - 13:58:15 EST

I must confess now. I simply made it all up and the journal as well.

I hope my humour offended no one.

However it does show how daft YEC "theories " are. Think of something
totally daft, wrap it up in pseudoscientific language and you have a theory
at least as good as Darwin's or Einstein's!!!!

I wish I had the maths and then I could have sent it off to CRSQ and then
confessed after publication.

Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Wallace" <wdwllace@sympatico.ca>
To: "Jon Tandy" <tandyland@earthlink.net>
Cc: <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: [asa] moon dust

> It seems to me that a miraculous account for the production and disposal
> of the water for a global flood, should be just that. Don't bother with a
> comet to suck out 10**17 pounds of water, God could simply create and
> destroy the quantity of water needed without any serious side effects like
> energy consumption or production and no momentum affects... I doubt that
> the people of the day would have been able to tell the difference due to
> the lack of scientific knowledge and instrumentation as God could easily
> arrange for the action to be hidden.
>
> Just to be clear I do not suggest that their was a global flood.
>
> Dave
>
> Jon Tandy wrote:
>> Funny thing is, I had mentioned this thread (as an example of bad YEC
>> science) to my 11-year old son this morning, who I'm trying to introduce
>> to some non-YEC perspectives, and he responded that maybe Noah was on the
>> other side of the earth (he didn't consider the "knocking the bottom out
>> of the ark" part). I suppose you're right, it's not too great a miracle
>> to have the comet pass on the other side of the earth from Noah. Not
>> nearly as great a miracle as having a comet suck 100 million billion
>> pounds of water out of the earth's gravitational pull, carry it 50
>> million miles, and slam it into Mars. I wonder if that much water mass
>> traveling out of the atmosphere would cause any major meteorological
>> effects? I suppose much of it would evaporate in the upper atmosphere on
>> the way out, just like incoming spacecraft experience 3000 degree
>> temperatures?
>> Jon Tandy
>>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Jan 15 15:02:24 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 15 2007 - 15:02:25 EST