It seems to me that a miraculous account for the production and disposal
of the water for a global flood, should be just that. Don't bother with
a comet to suck out 10**17 pounds of water, God could simply create and
destroy the quantity of water needed without any serious side effects
like energy consumption or production and no momentum affects... I
doubt that the people of the day would have been able to tell the
difference due to the lack of scientific knowledge and instrumentation
as God could easily arrange for the action to be hidden.
Just to be clear I do not suggest that their was a global flood.
Dave
Jon Tandy wrote:
> Funny thing is, I had mentioned this thread (as an example of bad YEC
> science) to my 11-year old son this morning, who I'm trying to introduce
> to some non-YEC perspectives, and he responded that maybe Noah was on
> the other side of the earth (he didn't consider the "knocking the bottom
> out of the ark" part).
>
> I suppose you're right, it's not too great a miracle to have the comet
> pass on the other side of the earth from Noah. Not nearly as great a
> miracle as having a comet suck 100 million billion pounds of water out
> of the earth's gravitational pull, carry it 50 million miles, and slam
> it into Mars. I wonder if that much water mass traveling out of the
> atmosphere would cause any major meteorological effects? I suppose much
> of it would evaporate in the upper atmosphere on the way out, just like
> incoming spacecraft experience 3000 degree temperatures?
>
>
> Jon Tandy
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Mon Jan 15 08:16:18 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 15 2007 - 08:16:18 EST