Re: [asa] Is Peer-Review the Be All and End All of Science?

Frankly I take no notice of any of Denyse O'Leary's journalistic capers as she is remarkably slipshod in all she writes.

Oh for the day when ID has just one little nugget of scientific argument!

Peer reviewing does have its faults as all of us know of papers which have got through the net and shouldn't and vice versa. It's also happened to many of us.

Michael
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Pim van Meurs
  To: Janice Matchett
  Cc: asa@calvin.edu
  Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 4:00 AM
  Subject: Re: [asa] Is Peer-Review the Be All and End All of Science?

  So now ID is whining that peer review is broken or that peer review is not that important. Perhaps if ID could point to any non begging ID relevant papers? But of course they cannot and thus have to find an alternative explanation as to why ID remains scientifically vacuous.

  Behe's refused 'paper' was about a 'rebuttal' , Meyer's paper about the Cambrian was of dubious quality.

  On Nov 16, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Janice Matchett wrote:

    Someone just posted this on FR. ~ Janice :)

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Nov 17 05:55:23 2006