So now ID is whining that peer review is broken or that peer review
is not that important. Perhaps if ID could point to any non begging
ID relevant papers? But of course they cannot and thus have to find
an alternative explanation as to why ID remains scientifically vacuous.
Behe's refused 'paper' was about a 'rebuttal' , Meyer's paper about
the Cambrian was of dubious quality.
On Nov 16, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Janice Matchett wrote:
> Someone just posted this on FR. ~ Janice :)
>
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Nov 16 23:00:48 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 16 2006 - 23:00:48 EST