RE: [asa] The Bible does not require a Neolithic Adam!

From: Glenn Morton <glennmorton@entouch.net>
Date: Tue Oct 24 2006 - 19:49:29 EDT

Burgy wrote:
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 9:16 AM
>Glad you are back on the list. Sorry to hear of your illness
> though. You are in my prayers.
>

Thanks,

> Current plans have us in Houston for much of January 2007 so
> will try hard this time to look you up.

I look forward to meeting you finally. You have always been a great help to
me.
>
> You wrote: "I am going to try to re-focus here. everyone is
> focusing on childbirth = when the big archaeological picture
> of things is that everything associated = with humanity goes
> back hundreds of thousands to millions of years but =
> Christians don't want to deal with that data."
>
> Not all Christians, of course. You tar with too large a
> brush. Speaking just for myself, I find your data compelling.
> I have used it in a Sunday School class to adults in Denver
> and to teenagers in Durango. I plan to write it up for a
> future article (probably March) in the Rico Bugle.

Of course, not all. But the vast majority don't. The only other apologist
published on the issue of which I am aware who is willing to have a 500 kyr
or more Adam is me and Bernard Ramm. There may be some who are unpublished.
The feeling I get from most here is that Adam isn't all that important in
the grand scheme of things so there is no reason trying to do anything
concordistic with him, like determine who he is, what species he was and
when he lived. Dick, of course, is the huge exception to this. He cares
greatly about finding a real Adam and for that I respect him greatly even if
I disagree strongly with him (I suspect the feeling is mutual).

glenn
They're Here: The Pathway Papers
Foundation, Fall, and Flood
Adam, Apes and Anthropology

http://home.entouch.net/dmd/dmd.htm
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu
> [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On Behalf Of Carol or
> John Burgeson

> To: asa@calvin.edu; glennmorton@entouch.net
> Subject: RE: [asa] The Bible does not require a Neolithic Adam!
>
>
> Hi Glenn:
>
>
> Burgy
>
> For four new book reviews, see www.burgy.50megs.com/recent.htm
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
> "unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Oct 24 19:50:15 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 24 2006 - 19:50:15 EDT