RE: [asa] The Bible does not require a Neolithic Adam!

From: Carol or John Burgeson <burgytwo@juno.com>
Date: Tue Oct 24 2006 - 10:16:29 EDT

Hi Glenn:

Glad you are back on the list. Sorry to hear of your illness though. You
are in my prayers.

Current plans have us in Houston for much of January 2007 so will try
hard this time to look you up.

You wrote: "I am going to try to re-focus here. everyone is focusing on
childbirth =
when the big archaeological picture of things is that everything
associated =
with humanity goes back hundreds of thousands to millions of years but =
Christians don't want to deal with that data."

Not all Christians, of course. You tar with too large a brush. Speaking
just for myself, I find your data compelling. I have used it in a Sunday
School class to adults in Denver and to teenagers in Durango. I plan to
write it up for a future article (probably March) in the Rico Bugle.

Burgy

For four new book reviews, see www.burgy.50megs.com/recent.htm

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Oct 24 10:33:47 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 24 2006 - 10:33:48 EDT