Re: [asa] Re: Cosmological vs. Biological Design

From: Michael Roberts <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
Date: Tue Oct 10 2006 - 10:32:49 EDT

One of the problems is that many scientists may be good scientists but =
have a weak theological grounding and many theologians are weak on =
science. I say this as a fact rather than critically. It is =
exceptionally hard for a scientist to have the time to spend on
getting =
his theology up to M Div standard and unless a theologian has a =
scientific background their science will be weak.
Several science and religion writers like Peacocke and Polkinghorne =
wrote their productive theological work AFTER a career in science.
Hence what is needed is multiple authorship on these subjects drawing =
theologians , OT scholars , biologists geologists etc and the odd =
anthropologist to deal with the Hobbit! (and not dabblers from other =
fields)

Michael

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Tue Oct 17 16:54:41 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 17 2006 - 16:54:41 EDT