On 7/14/06, RFaussette@aol.com <RFaussette@aol.com> wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/14/2006 12:12:54 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> rich.blinne@gmail.com writes:
>
> Nah. George and I are saying precisely the same thing. All I am adding is
> that George's point is not merely a Lutheran one. Since you don't get
> George's explanation, you won't get mine.
>
> On other lists with biblical scholars Davies, Thompson, etc. you have to
> provide an argument, not a presumption. I labor under those restrictions on
> those lists. Here you labor under an illusion if you think that's an
> acceptable response.
>
> rich faussette
>
You labor under the illusion that I am debating you. I am confident that
what I have written provides sufficient detail for readers to properly
evaluate my arguments. I have long ago stopped trying to convince you. I am
not talking to you. I am talking to the other people on the list and
ultimately they and not you and me who are the final arbiters of
acceptableness.
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jul 14 12:49:24 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 14 2006 - 12:49:24 EDT