At 06:20 PM 6/16/2006, Dick Fischer wrote:
>Leviticus isn't my concern. Hares do appear to chew. Maybe you like
>this explanation from Strong's concordance: "probably an extinct
>animal because no known hare chews its cud, exact meaning is
>unknown, and best left untranslated as 'arnebeth.'" What animals
>went extinct in the last three thousand years that used to chew its
>cud? Beats me. .."
@ "...The mistake is in our applying of the scientific terms of
rumination to something that does not require it."
<http://www.tektonics.org/af/cudchewers.html>Is the Bible Wrong About
a Rabbit Chewing
Cud<http://www.tektonics.org/af/cudchewers.html>?
http://www.tektonics.org/af/cudchewers.html
A SAB story http://www.tektonics.org/sab/sabdeut.html
~ Janice
To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Fri Jun 16 18:35:54 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 16 2006 - 18:35:54 EDT