Re: [asa] Re: Are there guidelines for accommodational interpretation?

What Michael wrote is uncomfortably close to Baal .
Don
Michael Roberts wrote:

> Baa!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* D. F. Siemens, Jr. <mailto:dfsiemensjr@juno.com>
> *To:* glennmorton@entouch.net <mailto:glennmorton@entouch.net>
> *Cc:* PHSeely@msn.com <mailto:PHSeely@msn.com> ; asa@calvin.edu
> <mailto:asa@calvin.edu> ; pleuronaia@gmail.com
> <mailto:pleuronaia@gmail.com> ; drsyme@cablespeed.com
> <mailto:drsyme@cablespeed.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2006 6:11 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [asa] Re: Are there guidelines for accommodational
> interpretation?
>
> Of course the Bible is false. It says, "The Lord is my shepherd."
> That means that the writer was a sheep. But he has not an /Ovis
> aries/. He was a /Homo sapiens/. The statement is clearly a
> deliberate falsehood. So, to revise Mark Twain's dictum, there are
> lies, damned lies, and poetry.
> Dave
>
>

To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@calvin.edu with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Jun 15 18:18:12 2006