Re: 666 Day

At 01:46 AM 6/8/2006, Pim van Meurs wrote:

><quote> Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) lashed out at Coulter
>for a "vicious, mean-spirited attack," and added, "perhaps her book
>should have been called 'Heartless'" instead of "Godless." </quote>

@ "I think if she's worried about people being mean to women she
should have a talk with her husband... "This is, I remind you, Bill
Clinton's wife.. and I'm the one who's mean to women?" ... " Ann
Coulter 6/7/2006 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1645307/posts

An Open Letter To Hillary Clinton http://www.apfn.org/apfn/Juanita.htm

 From the DATELINE interview with Lisa Myers:

[huge snip]

Juanita Broaddrick: "Yes, I told him 'Please don't.' He was such a
different person at that moment, he was just a vicious awful
person." ..."When everything was over with, he got up and
straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment and he walks to
the door, and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out
the door he says 'You better get some ice on that.' And he turned and
went out the door." # 142
@ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1645307/posts?page=142#142

"For years liberals have relied on a strategy of faking out the
American public in order to win elections. Instead of accurately
articulating their beliefs and engaging in an honest debate, they
scour the nation for the perfect patsy. A hysterical mother who is
willing to go on national television and call the President a "furor"
and "evil maniac" is akin to seeing the stigmata. Liberals' ecstasy
over Cindy Sheehan, Max Cleland, and the widows who made a spectacle
of themselves in the midst of the 9/11 Commission epitomizes their
secret weapon for winning back America -- a doctrine of infallibility
in which victory goes to the most hysterical.

As Coulter writes:

Finally, the Democrats hit on an ingenious strategy: They would
choose only messengers whom we're not allowed to reply to. That's why
all Democratic spokesmen these days are sobbing, hysterical women.
You can't respond to them because that would be questioning the
authenticity of their suffering. Liberals haven't changed the
message, just the messenger. All the most prominent liberal spokesmen
are people with "absolute moral authority" -- Democrats with a dead
husband, a dead child, a wife who works at the CIA, a war record,
terminal illness, or as a last resort, being on a first-name basis
with Nelson Mandela. Like Oprah during Sweeps Week, liberals have
come to rely exclusively on people with sad stories... [snip]

To continue: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1643602/posts

~ Janice ..... BTW! I almost forgot! you can order your
"antichrist" poster
here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1644465/posts?page=4#4

>Pim van Meurs <pimvanmeurs@yahoo.com> wrote:
>There is still some hope for her...
>
>Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> wrote:
>At 02:25 AM 6/6/2006, Pim van Meurs wrote:
>
>>If she's the anti-christ then perhaps I am on the wrong side...
>>Man, tell me it isn't so. ... Still...
>
>@ "Still...." http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1644246/posts?page=5#5
>
>~ Janice :)
>
>
>
>>Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>At 11:38 PM 6/5/2006, Dick Fischer wrote:
>>
>>>.....Before anyone crawls under the bed to escape the antichrist
>>>..... say a prayer or two just in case.
>>@ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1644094/posts?page=5#5 ~
>>Janice :)
>
>
Received on Thu Jun 8 09:06:52 2006