Randy writes:
> The [RATE II] book is filled with phrases like "could have" or "we might
> suppose" to reconcile many types of problems. Any attempt to refute these
> quickly becomes tedious and would inevitably be met with counter-illogic.
Bob's comment:
Randy, I have found this to be the case in virtually every piece of YEC
literature I have read. Morris, Sr.'s writings are repleat with such
qualifiers; unfortunately, they get lost when the arguments are passed on to
listeners in pews and lecture halls. It is one of the things that is so
maddening about reading YEC literature, as I am reminding myself presently:
I am preparing to write an annotated essay on YEC.
To all of you, a request: what are the most salient points do you think one
should make in writing an essay that presents and then critiques the YEC
message? Such feedback would be most helpful
Bob Schneider
Received on Tue May 23 09:06:07 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 23 2006 - 09:06:07 EDT