Re: Things that don't evolve

As, of course, are pintz because they are both definitional. JimA

Charles Carrigan wrote:

> quartz.
>
> cwc
>
> <><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><
> Charles W. Carrigan, Ph.D.
> Olivet Nazarene University
> Dept. of Geology
> One University Ave.
> Bourbonnais, IL 60914
> PH: (815) 939-5346
> FX: (815) 939-5071
>
>
>
> >>> Gregory Arago <gregoryarago@yahoo.ca> 3/14/2006 5:02 AM >>>
> In light of several conversations happening these days at ASA, the
> Alliance for Science which speaks of "the support for evolution among
> the 10,000 Christian clergy," and particularly the words of Ted Davis,
> who wrote last week that, "Yes, it is my view that evolution functions
> as a 'theory of everything.' Here I am defining 'evolution' very
> broadly to mean the 'modern creation story' as it is sometimes
> called," a question comes to mind as relevant.
>
> Can someone give an example of something that doesn't evolve (into
> being or having become)? Are there any t hings that don't evolve?
>
> Please note that I do not belong to an anti-evoltuion movement and
> neither do I support ID or the IDM. This question is meant to check if
> scientists at ASA can offer any kind of boundary or limitation for
> evolutionary theory. If not, one might be left to conclude that
> evolution is a 'theory of every thing' for many scientists.
>
> What are examples of things that don't evolve?
>
> G. Arago
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Make Yahoo! Canada your Homepage Yahoo! Canada Homepage
> <http://ca.yahoo.com/bin/set>
Received on Tue Mar 14 11:18:56 2006