Re: Things that don't evolve

From: Charles Carrigan <CCarriga@olivet.edu>
Date: Tue Mar 14 2006 - 10:37:49 EST

quartz.
 
cwc
 
<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><<><
Charles W. Carrigan, Ph.D.
Olivet Nazarene University
Dept. of Geology
One University Ave.
Bourbonnais, IL 60914
PH: (815) 939-5346
FX: (815) 939-5071
 

>>> Gregory Arago <gregoryarago@yahoo.ca> 3/14/2006 5:02 AM >>>

In light of several conversations happening these days at ASA, the Alliance for Science which speaks of "the support for evolution among the 10,000 Christian clergy," and particularly the words of Ted Davis, who wrote last week that, "Yes, it is my view that evolution functions as a 'theory of everything.' Here I am defining 'evolution' very broadly to mean the 'modern creation story' as it is sometimes called," a question comes to mind as relevant.
 
Can someone give an example of something that doesn't evolve (into being or having become)? Are there any t hings that don't evolve?
 
Please note that I do not belong to an anti-evoltuion movement and neither do I support ID or the IDM. This question is meant to check if scientists at ASA can offer any kind of boundary or limitation for evolutionary theory. If not, one might be left to conclude that evolution is a 'theory of every thing' for many scientists.
 
What are examples of things that don't evolve?
 
G. Arago

Make Yahoo! Canada your Homepage Yahoo! Canada Homepage
Received on Tue Mar 14 10:40:03 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 14 2006 - 10:40:11 EST