Re: Special Creation

From: <glennmorton@entouch.net>
Date: Tue Mar 07 2006 - 08:15:20 EST
David Opderbeck wrote:

>>Ok -- but isn't this effectively what we see now in the human genome?  In modern humans, there is not a great deal of genetic diversity throughout the existing population.  We are a young species.  Our genome, however, contains evidence of far more ancient haplotypes.  Observing where those haplotypes occur in the genome and the number of mutations between them permits the construction of a haplotype tree that permits estimates about population growth and gene flows.  So yes, the new Imago Dei man's ancestors would likely show limited genetic variability a couple hundred thousand years from now.  But since He inherited my genome intact, wouldn't a Haplotype tree of his ancestors' genome show the same evidence of ancient haplotypes that mine shows?  <<

While humans are less diverse than many species, there is still far more diversity than can be fit into 100,000 years. That is the whole point of Templeton's work. That is why he says the replacement theory is strongly rejected. 

Received on Tue Mar 7 08:16:27 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 07 2006 - 08:16:27 EST