Don Nield says,
>it is not unreasonable that Sternberg's action was repudiated by the
>scientific society that owns the journal. It seems to me that bringing the
>journal into disrepute is a reasonable basis for the withdrawal of
>privileges.
I'm curious: What should we think about Mike Behe's exclusion from
science journals? Even if a reviewer doesn't like Behe's ANSWERS, it seems
that his QUESTIONS are scientifically interesting and are worthy of being
asked.
Mike describes his experiences in "Correspondence with Science
Journals: Response to Critics concerning Peer-Review" at
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?program=CRSC%20%20Responses&command=view&id=450
Craig
Received on Thu Mar 2 13:21:57 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 02 2006 - 13:22:05 EST