Re: Small probabilities

Randy,

It is a simple principle of numerical geometry that a symmetrical
hexagon/hexagram pair may be generated by the self-intersection/union of a
triangle possessing a single centroid counter. The triangular forms of 2701
(sum of the 7 Hebrew words of Genesis 1:1) and 703 (sum of the final two
words of the same verse which, incidentally, fits precisely into
2701-as-triangle, thereby generating a trio of 666-as-triangle) have this
capability. It now transpires that the pair 469/937, generated by
703-as-triangle, may be derived from simple combinations of words within the
verse. These facts are demonstrated in a recently added Addendum to the
page "Creation Geometries - Part 1" which may be found at
http://homepage.virgin.net/tgvernon.jenkins/Astounding.htm.

This further reinforces my claim that the Bible's opening Hebrew words
represent a supreme example of _non-biological ID_ - a claim that no-one has
been able to refute. Iain - an expert in the analysis of number sets, and
personally well-acquainted with these phenomena - has recently aired the 3
possble explanations: (1) The pattern is a complete coincidence; (2) The
pattern is deliberate and was put there by human authors; and (3) The
pattern is deliberate and is intentional Divine action for some purpose. He
rules out the first with the words "I think there are sound methods for
showing that (1) is not the case." (and surely this must be one's gut
feeling when presented with a body of data possessing such rock-like
integrity, intensity and cohesion). As you yourself have pointed out, the
appearance of 'e' in the general proceedings appears to rule out (2) - added
to which we have the problem that the writing of Genesis 1:1 _preceded_ the
Hebrew scheme of alphabetic numeration by many centuries; and again, that
the Greek forms of the Lord's name and title (closely integrated with
Genesis 1:1) appear in the Septuagint (a translation of the OT dating from
around 300 BC). We are therefore left with option (3).

What do you suggest we do about it? The application of our God-given reason
has led us to this critical point. Is it not appropriate - indeed,
essential (if we are to honour the Author of it all!) - that we continue to
exercise that reason in prayerful consideration of what the purpose of these
wonders might be? Can there be a better forum than ASA in which to do this?

Regards,

Vernon
www.otherbiblecode.com
 
Received on Sat Jan 7 17:40:33 2006