Not only was the case decided, it was a slam dunk in many ways for science. The judge basically ruled that intelligent design fails as a science
<quote>Accordingly, the purported positive argument for ID does not satisfy the ground rules of science which require testable hypotheses based upon natural
explanations.
</quote>
On Panda's
<quote>
Dr. Padian’s demonstrative slides, prepared on the basis of peer-reviewing scientific literature, illustrate how Pandas systematically distorts and misrepresents
established, important evolutionary principles.</quote>
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/051220_kitzmiller_342.pdf
Check out PandasThumb for indepth discussions
http://pandasthumb.org/
----- Original Message ----
From: Janice Matchett <janmatch@earthlink.net>
To: asa@calvin.edu
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 8:26:03 AM
Subject: Intelligent Design case decided - Dover, Pennsylvania
Fox News Posted on 12/20/2005 10:54:38 AM EST by http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1543993/posts
*
yahoo news ^ Posted on 12/20/2005 11:16:05 AM EST by http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1544015/posts
Received on Tue Dec 20 13:02:58 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 20 2005 - 13:02:58 EST