RE: transitional fossils

From: Hofmann, Jim <jhofmann@exchange.fullerton.edu>
Date: Sat Dec 03 2005 - 10:50:41 EST

This file is out of date since it hasn't been updated for several years, but it lists some examples:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html

Keith Miller's article might also be helpful:

http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/Miller.html

I have quite a few details on my website at entry 10:

Jim Hofmann
http://nsmserver2.fullerton.edu/departments/chemistry/evolution_creation/web/

-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu on behalf of wgreen8
Sent: Sat 12/3/2005 6:36 AM
To: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: transitional fossils
 
Dear Dr. Garrison,

I have always assumed that the impetus for Gould and Eldredge's "punctuated
equilibrium" hypothesis. That is, there would be no need for such a
hyopothesis if there were an abundance of transitional fossils.

God bless,

Bill Green
www.god4science.com

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 22:25:47 -0600, Preston Garrison wrote
> All you fossil experts,
>
> We all commonly hear the assertions about there being "no
> transitional fossils." I see the papers periodically in Science or
> Nature about a new fossil set of significance, but I'm allergic to
> morphology so I pay minimal attention. I'm wondering if someone has
> compiled a nice fat bibliography of papers on this subject to give
> people who make this claim. Anyone know of such?
>
> Preston G.
> --
> Preston Garrison, Ph.D.
> Instructor
> UTHSCSA
> Biochem. Dept. MSC 7760 Insert the usual disclaimers here.
> 7703 Floyd Curl Dr.
> San Antonio, TX 78229-3900
> garrisonp@uthscsa.edu
> 210-567-3702
> http://biochem.uthscsa.edu/~barnes
Received on Sat Dec 3 10:59:11 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 03 2005 - 10:59:11 EST