>1st, I said in my earlier post that you were playing the "poor me" card with tongue in cheek. I realize that you actually have a pretty >good opinion of yourself.
George, if I were to believe that most people here would try to sell me the Brooklyn Bridge.
>2d, precisely the problem is that your starting point (& that of many others in such discussions) is wrong. While creation &
>Genesis are important, we have to start with the cross & resurrection if we expect to get any Christian insight into them. I am not
>"changing the subject" when I insist upon that but arguing for the proper way of approaching the subject.
No, as I have explained many times there are lots of religions with resurrected Gods. Will the REAL resurrected God PLEASE stand up? You can't start at the resurrection because it is not tangibly verifiable.
>3d, you're the one who started with the "village idiot" language. I repeat what I said before, that by no means do I think you're an
>idiot - but that I'm amazed at some of the goofy things you insist upon.
>Official Declaration: I do not believe Glenn Morton to be the village idiot & retract any language of mine that suggests the contrary.
Thank you, at least I now have at least one person you believes I am above the level of an idiot--and it is documented. I feel like George Wallace, who got a discharge from the service for having a 10% mental disability. When he ran for governor, his opponent brought up this horrendous issue of a mentally disabled governor. Wallace, in his characteristic manner, proudly proclaimed, "I have a document attesting to the fact that I am at least 90% here. Does my opponent have a document attesting to the fact that he is even 50% here?" Wallace won the election.
Received on Tue May 24 09:54:44 2005