Peter Cook wrote:
>I am new to this dialog, and at this point have no particular axe to grind. I am interested in learning what you consider to be those
>points at which the Bible is relevant to the "real". And in general, what anyone would consider "scientific evidence" for design.
I explain why I think Design is as valid a scientific concept as the concepts being bandied about by others. It requires that the universe be evolutionary, and the concepts here are ignored by those who don't want the Bible to say anything about the physical world (I want to define that. Until someone has the Bible say something about things which can be verified, it isn't saying anything about the tangible physical world--the resurrection, unfortunately is believed by faith and is NOT verifiable from this historical vantage point).
Received on Tue May 24 09:04:45 2005