>As often happens when we get into one of these exchanges, you end up totally misrepresenting my position. I have always i
>nsisted that the cross & resurrection of Jesus (among other things) are claims for which there is good supporting evidence as
>"tangible realities." & if you again make your hilarious assertion that there is more evidence for your resuscitated 5 Myr mutant ape >fantasy than for the resurrection of Jesus I really will wonder if you're the village idiot.
You know George, it is sad when the person who accuses me of playing the poor me card (which I wasn't), then turns it around and plays poor me, you have misrepresented me. I find it ironic.
The fact is we are not talking about the resurrection we have been talking about CREATION IN GENESIS, but you always want to go talk about other parts of the Bible than what is actually being discussed. Please stay on topic. I repeat my assertions: If God can't tell us anything tangible about reality, is he GOD?
Your last statement proves my initial comment that you do think I am the village idiot--contra your initial claim. Should I add the letters Q.E. D. to this post?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 24 2005 - 08:29:52 EDT