RE: cruzan v schiavo what a difference a decade makes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu
> [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu] On Behalf Of jack syme
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 10:42 PM
> To: Glenn Morton; 'Bill Dozier'
> Cc: 'ASA'
> Subject: Re: cruzan v schiavo what a difference a decade makes
>
>
> It is a big deal when you are arguing that it is only the
> husbands word that
> Terri Schiavo would want to have her feeding tube removed.
> IT IS NOT JUST
> THE HUSBANDS WORD. That is the point. The courts involved
> testimony from
> others also.
>

And the court decision, which you thought supported your case clearly
said that the testimony was all over the place. That means there is
nothing clear cut about this at all. You really should read that link
you sent out.

And by the way, you failed to acknowledge how weak your argument was
that stated that this is ok because 2 courts have allowed it. Courts
rule badly all the time. Look at the number of innocent people sent to
death row. Look at the Dred Scott decision. A court ruling is not a
divine fiat.
Received on Sat Mar 19 09:01:47 2005