Re: cruzan v schiavo what a difference a decade makes

It is a big deal when you are arguing that it is only the husbands word that
Terri Schiavo would want to have her feeding tube removed. IT IS NOT JUST
THE HUSBANDS WORD. That is the point. The courts involved testimony from
others also.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn Morton" <glennmorton@entouch.net>
To: "'jack syme'" <drsyme@cablespeed.com>; "'Bill Dozier'"
<wddozier@mac.com>
Cc: "'ASA'" <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 11:38 PM
Subject: RE: cruzan v schiavo what a difference a decade makes

>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jack syme [mailto:drsyme@cablespeed.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 10:07 PM
>> To: Glenn Morton; 'Bill Dozier'
>> Cc: 'ASA'
>> Subject: Re: cruzan v schiavo what a difference a decade makes
>>
>>
>> As far as the judge (Judge Greer) and his whimsy. This
>> whimsy was supported
>> by the Florida appellate court.
>
> Yeah, and the courts also supported slavery 150 years ago in the Dred
> Scott decision. So big deal.
>
Received on Fri Mar 18 23:42:51 2005