> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Murphy [mailto:gmurphy@raex.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 6:13 AM
> Some would answer #1 that it's never appropriate. In that
> case the details
> of the Schiavo case are irrelevant. That is a consistent
> position to take
> but those who do so should say that clearly & not confuse the
> issue by
> debating the husband's motives, &c.
In such cases it is always appropriate to look at motivation. Only in
some ivory tower philosophical discussion does this kind of separation
of issues arise. For Schiavo, this isn't a theoretical discussion.
Received on Sat Mar 19 08:55:38 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 19 2005 - 08:55:39 EST